Why register? ...To Enhance Your Experience
+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 37
  1. #1
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Woodbridge Twp, New Jersey
    Posts
    863

    Question American Lafrance Eagle 75' Mid-Mount Platform

    My department has a Mack/Baker Aerialscope that we are in the planing stages of doing a Aerialscope / Remount and looking into other possible new fire apparatus as a replacement. we need input from any departments that have a new American Lafrance 75' Mid-Mount tower ladder that can give us some information on the following . The " Total cost " " Overall lenght " Rear axle GVW " etc. Thanks !


  2. #2
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    north east
    Posts
    26

    Default

    My Dept. is also looking at the same ALF truck to replace a 1989 Aerialscope. We have investigated the performance of the truck and it will flow 1000Gpm and hold 1000# in the platform unrestricted. The jack spread is better then the Aerialscope. Our 89 Scope is 10’6” height and the American Lafrance can meet this requirement. We looked at the Jersey City Tower Ladder 4 ALF 75’ mid-mount and it was impressive. I believe the wheel base was shorter then our current Aerialscope which will allow us better maneuverability. Our committee will probably go with a single manual monitor in the platform with 5” water intake on both sides of the body. The single biggest improvement will be the Ladder Tower giving us unrestricted egress to and from the roof. You can’t do this with an Aerial scope. The ALF body has a lot of storage.

  3. #3
    Forum Member Firefighter807's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    East (Right) Coast
    Posts
    253

    Default

    Content deleted by author.
    Last edited by Firefighter807; 07-08-2009 at 06:43 PM.

  4. #4
    Forum Member efd281's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    El Dorado, Kansas
    Posts
    218

    Talking '75 Platforms

    I am not trying to hijack your thread, but since someone else has already started the mudslinging, may I please interject? Give your local Sutphen dealer a call. If mid-mount is what you want then there is no equal to the Sutphen product. I do agree that buying from ALF right now is throwing money away. (Personally, I'd rather take a swift kick in the junk than buy their junk) But, Pierce is not your answer. Just take time to consider the people who have been in the mid-mount game the longest. As a matter of fact, mid-mount is all that Sutphen will build!! Food for thought!
    I have but one ambition in life and that is to become a firefighter.

  5. #5
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Posts
    242

    Default

    I agree, with ALF up in the air right now, I surely look elsewhere. Thank God we aren't talking delivery of an ALF aerial next week. We have a Rescue Command Walk in , that's enough. We went with Smeal. I'm a big Pierce fan myself, but I don't write the checks.
    If you are buying an aerial, look at Pierce, Smeal, Sutphen or E-One. Probably in that order. These are all good solid rigs and companies.

  6. #6
    MembersZone Subscriber
    Join Date
    Nov 1999
    Posts
    820

    Default

    I'm no ALF fan, and I do agree with the message your conveying, but come on man. All you ever do is post "XXXXXXXXXXX suck, buy Pierce". You offer no constructive reasons why to look at Pierce, no reason why they are superior and no real reason to change the mind of the person who posted the question.

    He was asking for opinions and facts from people on the forums who have EXPERIENCE with, specifically, ALF 75' MM platforms. There is no harm in that. He is asking to better educate himself and/or his department on an upcoming purchase.

    And your either a uneducated Pierce employee or an uneducated Pierce fan because Pierce doesn't make a 75' MM platform. They only make an 85' MM platform unless they have one being secretly developed for delivery to FDNY for stealth trials with it running every fire in all 5 boroughs.

    And EFD281 is on to something with Sutphen. If your set on a MM platform, Sutphen and Aerialscope have been doing it the longest and they make aerials in the length your interested in along with good reputations.

    Good luck no matter how it works out.
    Last edited by STATION2; 10-23-2005 at 09:35 PM.
    Stay low and move it in.

    Be safe.


    Larry

  7. #7
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    134

    Default

    And here we go again (yes i'll bite on the troll's bait). Why don't you start a thread that just says "Here's why Pierce is the best truck ever" and then let people who ask about unrelated topics find the answer to their questions. I'm sure that his or her fire department has evaluated Pierce or even Sutphen, as they are major manufacturers.

    Sorry for the snappy response, just tired of seeing every thread, no matter how directed the question is, turn into an argument about how great Pierce, E-One, Seagrave, are and how bad KME is.

  8. #8
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    34

    Default junk u say and in the same breath sutphen

    alf is in all respects superior to sutphen any day or nite of the week as is pierce

    sutphen is and has always been a piece of junk

    the fdny sutphens were junk and were removed from service much to the protest of the sutphen bros

    cities here in ohio have sutphens and u cant climb the aerial

    not so with alf or pierce

    sutphen is essentially unchanged in many moons

    they were bargain basement but no more

    the new one for painesville ohio is over 800000

  9. #9
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Easton,Pa
    Posts
    368

    Default

    Station 2- I believe Pierce's mid-mount is a 95' platform, not 85.

  10. #10
    MembersZone Subscriber
    Join Date
    Nov 1999
    Posts
    820

    Default

    Thanks Sven, I meant 95' and typed 85'. I was thinking faster than I can type.
    Stay low and move it in.

    Be safe.


    Larry

  11. #11
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Woodbridge Twp, New Jersey
    Posts
    863

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by NewJerseyFFII
    My department has a Mack/Baker Aerialscope that we are in the planing stages of doing a Aerialscope / Remount and looking into other possible new fire apparatus as a replacement. we need input from any departments that have a new American Lafrance 75' Mid-Mount tower ladder that can give us some information on the following . The " Total cost " " Overall lenght " Rear axle GVW " etc. Thanks !
    We are only looking at ( 75' Mid-mount Platforms ) because of the trucks overall length, need a apparatus that will fit into the firehouse bay . Sure Pierce builds a great 95' tower & E- One has a 95' Mid-Mount but no " 75' ".

  12. #12
    MembersZone Subscriber
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    The North East
    Posts
    489

    Default

    Well not a 75 ft. but we're also finalizing our deal for a 90+ ft. MM tower. We toured the Northeast for three days talking to the firefighters who use them, not the chiefs and not the "wackers" who think only their company builds a real truck.

    E-One, KME and ALF were all within 10K of each other, Peirce was 110K more and Aerialscope was incomplete.

    Firefighter807:Is a Peirce worth $110,000 more than another built tot he same spec? What about the problems they have with the MM creeping out of the bed while parked? Seems Rocky Hill, Ct. lost their bucket on a low overpass because the bucket was up and out of the bed. How about the multiplexing magnets not lining up and causing the tower to "freeze"?

    Eveyone has gliches and the more NFPA and the safety Nazi's force feed stupid gadgets on us the more problems and danger we'll have.

  13. #13
    Forum Member Rescue101's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    Bridgton,Me USA
    Posts
    8,162

    Default

    Sutphens junk? Yeah,right. They seem to withstand years served and TCOO(total cost of ownership) pretty near as well as a 'scope and better than most of the rest of the breeds out there. You want to know about aerial devices? Ask a UNBIASED guy that works on them everyday like the UL test guy.You'll get differing opinions here too but from people who see the problems everyday. And Pierce wasn't a "first choice" for the guy that tested our ladder. Good thread,as we're looking to replace our ladder in the next couple years. T.C.

  14. #14
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    6

    Default

    Apparatus Fan,

    Check your numbers on the Painsville truck. I assume you meant to say 80,000 pounds but even at that, Sutphen doesn't manufacture an apparatus with a GVWR of 80,000 pounds. Their SP110, the tallest non articulating platform built in the USA, and the heaviest apparatus they manufacture only has a GVWR of 74,000 poounds.

    Sutphen was the first company to manufacture aerial platforms and their is a reason why they havent changed significantly in design, they dont need to.

    Sutphen still the oldest continually owned fire apparatus manufacturer in the country. And has been building aerial platforms for over 40 years, I think they might be doing something right.

  15. #15
    Forum Member efd281's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    El Dorado, Kansas
    Posts
    218

    Default Sutphen Quality

    Little changes over 40 years because of a design that was way ahead of it's time. It's been time tested and there has never been a Sutphen drop a fireman from the sky!!! Pierce, E-One, Seagrave, ALF........none can say the same.
    I have but one ambition in life and that is to become a firefighter.

  16. #16
    MembersZone Subscriber
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    North East
    Posts
    159

    Default

    Stick with the aerialscope... our dept has one they are very durable trucks... check out www.birdsborofd.org they had an awesome refurb done by pierce

  17. #17
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    34

    Default sutphen=junk

    kent ohio owned some sutphen pumpers that were more junk than the junk in city dump

    cleveland sutphens were piles of junk

    fdny sutphens were in service the shortest of all aerial platforms including aerialscopes alf/lti's etc

    painesvilles new rig is at 803k dollars so sutphen is not a bargain anymore

    the ladder cant be climbed according to the rep that came down to youngstown when they delivered their sutphen in 2000

    this nonsense about no need for improvements is garbage like the product itself

    sure wish sutphen would fold instead of all of these others

    see their latest new pic of a pumper they came out with?

    looks like somebody's nitemare

  18. #18
    MembersZone Subscriber
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Illinois
    Posts
    44

    Default

    Geeze, Sounds like someone stole your Code 3 Sutphen Pumper Model last Christmas................. Probably a good idea to stick to the thread or get help for the Demons !

  19. #19
    Forum Member DeputyChiefGonzo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2000
    Location
    Somewhere between genius and insanity!
    Posts
    13,582

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by efd281
    Little changes over 40 years because of a design that was way ahead of it's time. It's been time tested and there has never been a Sutphen drop a fireman from the sky!!! Pierce, E-One, Seagrave, ALF........none can say the same.

    I beg to differ... E-One has never had a ladder failure in the 22+ years they have been building them.
    ‎"The education of a firefighter and the continued education of a firefighter is what makes "real" firefighters. Continuous skill development is the core of progressive firefighting. We learn by doing and doing it again and again, both on the training ground and the fireground."
    Lt. Ray McCormack, FDNY

  20. #20
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    34

    Default reply to my friend edorolin

    with all due respect edorolin as a salesperson of fire apparatus as i noted u stated in one of ur posts in the archives ur sum total of output contributed to the forum isnt all that much quite frankly. not really much substance one can sink their teeth into . just a little of this and a litttle of that and a lot of really nothing. so my post cites specifics in response to someones glorifying sutphen versus the main thread of alf/lti 75ft platform. and what do u have to offer. a snide remark lacking in substance like 90% of all of ur other posts. so as far as sticking to the thread id like to see u just once stick to any thread intelligently.
    also if ur selling fire apparatus or whatever ur doing , spelling isnt going to help unless ur of course the clientelle is of like caliber as urself...of limited educational background

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. World Of Fire Report: 09-11-05
    By PaulBrown in forum World of Fire Daily Report
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 09-12-2005, 09:56 PM
  2. E-One 95 Ft. mid mount platform
    By Firetruck122 in forum Apparatus Innovation
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 04-05-2002, 02:35 PM
  3. American LaFrance Eagle Series
    By rcrompm46 in forum Apparatus Innovation
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 12-27-2001, 05:17 PM
  4. American Lafrance Silver Eagle Aerial
    By Resq14 in forum Apparatus Innovation
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 06-27-2001, 04:23 PM
  5. American LaFrance Eagle Chassis
    By Pat222 in forum Apparatus Innovation
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 10-08-1999, 09:20 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts