1. #1
    Forum Member

    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Woodbridge Twp, New Jersey
    Posts
    863

    Thumbs up Mack CF Apparatus in service ?

    We have a 1974 Mack/Baker tower still in front line service and about 8 months ago we retired a 1972 Mack cf 600 pumper. I feel that Mack built one of the best fire apparatus at that time! Please list your departments Mack cf apparatus by type , model , year and are they in-service today.

  2. #2
    Forum Member
    Dave1983's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Gator Country
    Posts
    4,157

    Default

    No front line units left around here. A couple of reserve pumpers still floating around. All mid 70's vintage I think. Ive never had the honor of serving on a CF.
    Fire Marshal/Safety Officer

    IAAI-NFPA-IAFC/VCOS-Retired IAFF

    "No his mind is not for rent, to any god or government"
    RUSH-Tom Sawyer

    Success is when skill meets opportunity
    Failure is when fantasy meets reality

  3. #3
    Forum Member

    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Borderstate
    Posts
    900

    Thumbs up 1977 Cf Mack On Line!

    One Mack 1977 CF pumper on line at my department as a second out pumper.Sweet engine.The only thing we have added is some man-saver bars for safety.
    Always a day late and a dollar short!

    Hillbilly Irish!

  4. #4
    Forum Member

    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Posts
    243

    Thumbs up

    http://www.smpffa.com/index.cfm?zone...s&starthere=11

    Ours is a reserve truck now, has been since 89, but the engine cranks up the second you press the button. Rumors are floating around we'll sell it next year when our newest engine comes in, but others say keep it for our fire academy as a trainer. It's a very good truck. Very tight in the drivers seat. Manual transmission to boot. If Mack still built trucks like this one, we'd have a fleet of them.

    A neighboring town also has one, story is it's from FDNY, Bronx.

  5. #5
    Forum Member
    FyredUp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 1999
    Location
    Rural Wisconsin, Retired from the burbs of Milwaukee
    Posts
    10,280

    Default

    My volly FD has a 1974 Mack CF that is in front line service. When we get our new engine it will become a dedicated Class B foam rig and supply engine for our new pumper.

    It was just pump tested and passed with only 20 rpm's higher than brand new.

    I agree if they were still being built we would own nothing else.

    FyredUp

  6. #6
    MembersZone Subscriber

    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    CT, USA
    Posts
    113

    Default

    About 2 years ago we sold our 1974 Mack/Baker Aerialscope to a neightboring town. We now have a 03 E-One 95' Mid-mount. The Mack went to Scotland, CT. It serves as their frontline aerial. Additionally, this piece was formerly Tower-131 out of "Red Hook, NY" where it saw most of its action.

  7. #7
    Let's talk fire trucks!
    BoxAlarm187's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Virginia
    Posts
    3,348

    Thumbs up Mack CF

    Not my department, but Chesterfield County, VA has a number of CF's still in service. They're a combination department, and in many stations, the career and volunteer staff are each assigned an engine.

    Engine 201 - 1980 Mack CF600 1000/500
    Engine 203 - 1980 Mack CF600 1000/500
    Engine 205 - 1983 Mack CF600 1500/500 (Pierce Enforcer on order to replace)
    Engine 6 - 1991 Mack CF/Grumman 1000/500
    Engine 206 - 1981 Mack CF 1000/500
    Engine 8 - 1991 Mack CF/Grumman 1000/500
    Truck 9 - 1990 Mack CF/Aerialscope 95' MM tower ladder
    Engine 10 - 1981 Mack CF600 1000/500
    Engine 11 - 1991 Mack CF/Grumman 1000/500
    Engine 211 - 1974 Mack CF/Grumman 1000/500
    Engine 12 - 1992 Mack CF/Grumman 1000/500
    Engine 13 - 1977 Mack CF 1000/500 (Pierce Enforcer on order to replace)

    The rigs in bold are career staffed.

    There are also a number of CF's that remain in service as reserve rigs and training pieces.

    Hope this helps...

  8. #8
    Forum Member
    dragonfyre's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Birdsboro, PA
    Posts
    967

    Default

    Just retired our Mack/Baker AerialScope. Still have a CF as our rescue truck.

    Both are former FDNY trucks.

    www.birdsborofd.org
    Last edited by dragonfyre; 11-29-2005 at 08:51 PM.
    Steve Dragon
    FFII, Fire Instructor II, Fire Officer I, Fire Appartus Driver Operator Certified
    Volunteers are never "off duty".
    http://www.bufd7.org

  9. #9
    Forum Member

    Join Date
    Jan 1999
    Location
    MA
    Posts
    1,744

    Default

    Last edited by hfd66truck; 11-26-2005 at 07:41 PM.

  10. #10
    MembersZone Subscriber

    Join Date
    Nov 1999
    Posts
    820

    Default

    I did almost my entire 1 year probation time on a '76 Mack CF pumper with a '76 Mack CF/Thibault 100' MM aerial in the adjoining bay. Both looked like hell and were beat to death, but they still ran like champs and did the job.

    As of right now the Houston fire department has gotten rid of all Mack CF pumpers and aerials they ever had. They all last served as reserves and have been disposed of.
    Stay low and move it in.

    Be safe.


    Larry

  11. #11
    Forum Member

    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    10

    Talking

    At one time, we had the second largest fleet of Mack apparatus in the country, next to FDNY. We've had approximately 40 pieces over the years, with 34-35 being in service at any given time up until the mid '90s. Mostly CF pumpers and tankers, with a few R model pumpers, an R model air unit, and 4 CF Aerialscopes (3 75's and 1 95ft.). We probably had enough parts in stock to build an entire unit, minus the chassis and engine. They were then, and still are in my opinion, some the best fire apparatus ever made. We'd still be using them if they still made the CF.

  12. #12
    Forum Member
    PFDTruck2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    421

    Default

    We have a 86 Mack/Baker 95' CF, a 89 CF and just replaced a late 70's CF with a Smeal. We also have 82, 94, and 99 MB's. You can view our apparatus
    om www.94firedept.com there is also a picture from 1993 that shows our Macks.
    When opening up the roof remember plywood comes in 4' X 8' sheets.

    www.94firedept.com

    IACOJ proud member

  13. #13
    Forum Member

    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Woodbridge Twp, New Jersey
    Posts
    863

    Question To: PFD Truck2

    Quote Originally Posted by PFDTruck2
    We have a 86 Mack/Baker 95' CF, a 89 CF and just replaced a late 70's CF with a Smeal. We also have 82, 94, and 99 MB's. You can view our apparatus
    om www.94firedept.com there is also a picture from 1993 that shows our Macks.
    Is your 1986 Mack/Baker Aerialscope a Ex- FDNY apparatus and if so did your fire department buy it from the Baker company as a totally rebuilt unit, also what was the cost $.

  14. #14
    Forum Member
    Bones42's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Location
    Pt. Beach, NJ
    Posts
    10,701

    Default

    1977 CF. Retired in 1991. Ran like crazy, pumped like mad, shifted like h@ll, rusted like a tin can.

    Man, I loved this truck.
    Attached Images Attached Images  
    "This thread is being closed as it is off-topic and not related to the fire industry." - Isn't that what the Off Duty forum was for?

  15. #15
    Forum Member
    PFDTruck2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    421

    Default

    No we bought it new almost 20 years ago.
    When opening up the roof remember plywood comes in 4' X 8' sheets.

    www.94firedept.com

    IACOJ proud member

  16. #16
    Forum Member

    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    27

    Default

    My company still uses a 1975 Mack CF-600 engine. It's soon to be replaced after 30 years of pretty reliable service. Like many other mid 70's CFs, rust is beginning to take it's toll. I joined the company when the Mack was only 5 years old and it already had significant rust. We had it refurbed in 1990 and it held up allot longer than other area Mack refurbs. Shifting the manual five speed was also an art in itself. The other re-occurring issue we had was with the radiator. In it's 30 years of active service, the radiator had to be repaired 6 times. Anyone who spent anytime on one of these classics knows how hard it is to pull the radiator for repair/replacement. I'm hoping that we could hang on to the Mack as an occasional parade piece for sentinmental reasons. Maybe I could convince the mrs.that it would look great parked in front of the homestead.

  17. #17
    Forum Member

    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    134

    Default

    Bones, does anything down there not rust like crazy in the salt air?

  18. #18
    Forum Member

    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    1

    Default Mack CF

    Here in Cleveland Oklahoma we have a 1980 Mack engine it is our first out engine. I have traced its history from us to Old Forge Pa Engine 93. They got it from FDNY Engine 274 in Queens. I would like to know if there is anybody that know more or worked on this truck.

  19. #19
    Forum Member
    Bones42's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Location
    Pt. Beach, NJ
    Posts
    10,701

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by orangehopeful
    Bones, does anything down there not rust like crazy in the salt air?
    Aluminum. It's easier to stave off the "pitting" than the steel rusting.

    Although, interestingly enough, other company in town has an early 70's Seagrave that does not have any rust on it at all. Then again, it was never a first line truck and probably leaves the building less than 20 times per year.
    "This thread is being closed as it is off-topic and not related to the fire industry." - Isn't that what the Off Duty forum was for?

  20. #20
    Forum Member

    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Schuylkill County Pa
    Posts
    20

    Default 1975 CF in service here

    We have a 1975 CF that is in service, front line. Will be retired in the spring of 2006 when new engine is finished. We also have a 1950 L model used now for shows and parades only. If Mack was still around we would have another.here are links to the pics of these two Macks, 1975/1950

    http://www.freewebs.com/mcfire/currentapparatus.htm
    http://www.freewebs.com/mcfire/retiredapparatus.htm

  21. #21
    Forum Member

    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Woodbridge Twp, New Jersey
    Posts
    863

    Thumbs up

    We replaced our 1972 Mack cf 600 1250 gpm/ 500wt pumper in Feb 2005 with a new KME Excel chassis pumper with a 10" raised roof, 1500 gpm/750 wt , 12Ga stainless body, 8K onan Gen, Led lighting , Q2 , 400Hp cummins for a cost of $ 270,000 . So far no problems with our apparatus and would buy a KME product again ! We have a 1992 Seagrave 10 man cab pumper and the cost to build a new one was over $ 427,000 , so we went will the lower priced pumper that we could afford!
    Last edited by NewJerseyFFII; 12-17-2005 at 06:16 PM.

  22. #22
    Forum Member

    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Woodbridge Twp, New Jersey
    Posts
    863

    Post

    The last Mack CF in our fleet of apparatus is a Baker Aerialscope 75' in it's 2nd tour of duty. A EX-fdny tower ladder that was stripped down by Baker, rebuilt, repainted , and sold to us in 1986 for $ 225,000 . To bad mack stopped building fire apparatus in 1991 !...
    Last edited by NewJerseyFFII; 03-04-2007 at 07:34 PM.

  23. #23
    Forum Member
    RAMFIRE42's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Blue Knob, Pa
    Posts
    179

    Thumbs up

    1973 Mack.
    Might I say I think the CF Mack was the BEST FIRETRUCK EVERY BUILT!!

    http://www.blueknobfire.com/blue%20k...%20company.htm

  24. #24
    Forum Member
    DeputyChiefGonzo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2000
    Location
    Somewhere between genius and insanity!
    Posts
    13,586

    Default

    This was our 1975 Mack CF-600 aerial with a Maxim 100 foot stick. Retired in 2000. We also had a 1872 Mack CF pumper, unfortunately, I have no pics of it.

    ‎"The education of a firefighter and the continued education of a firefighter is what makes "real" firefighters. Continuous skill development is the core of progressive firefighting. We learn by doing and doing it again and again, both on the training ground and the fireground."
    Lt. Ray McCormack, FDNY

  25. #25
    Forum Member
    Engine305's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Sahuarita AZ, formerly of Hewitt NJ
    Posts
    293

    Default Mack CF

    My Cf is a 1988 Ex FDNY Engine 24 from Manhattan, Reserve Engine 509. We got her at auction in 2003 and gave it a paintjob and put back the lights that NY stripped off of her. She runs like a top with no other money spent on her since. We are running her as our Rescue until our 2007 Enforcer Rescue Pumper comes in next month.
    pics on Fdnytrucks.com

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. ISO Company Personnel
    By FIRE549 in forum Firefighters Forum
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 05-16-2007, 07:15 PM
  2. Philly Apparatus Troubles
    By FORTff in forum Firefighters Forum
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 11-11-2005, 10:39 PM
  3. Rural Fire Apparatus Discussion
    By SamsonFCDES in forum Firefighters Forum
    Replies: 107
    Last Post: 09-20-2005, 08:06 PM
  4. FYI in CA
    By hootman in forum Firefighters Forum
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 09-28-2004, 01:04 AM
  5. EMS and the Fire Service: The Impact on the PGFD
    By bostonff in forum Firefighters Forum
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 01-21-2001, 10:16 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Log in

Click here to log in or register