One of the departments that I will be writing for this year would like to upgrade their packs and cascade systems to High Pressure. Currently their Low Pressure packs meet the latest NFPA standards (Integrated PASS, HUD, Universal RIT, etc.) Their reasoning currently is that by going to High Pressure they will have lighter packs by using carbon fiber bottles, 45 minute bottles instead of 30 minutes so that their firefighters can work longer without interuption, and interoperability since 7 out of 10 of their closest neighboring agencies have gone to High pressure.
First: Is this a viable request?
Second: They currently have 34 air-packs. Does this mean that if funded, they would be limited to 68 new high pressure bottles (one for the pack and one spare for each pack)? Or could they ask for additional bottles for their air supply unit?
Chris![]()
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 7 of 7
-
01-16-2006, 04:54 PM #1Forum Member
- Join Date
- Jul 2005
- Location
- Oregon
- Posts
- 119
Is upgrading to High Pressure a viable request?
-
01-16-2006, 06:00 PM #2MembersZone Subscriber
- Join Date
- Jun 2003
- Location
- Pennsylvania
- Posts
- 343
My uneducated guess would be no. If the packs are already nfpa compliant, how does the firefighter benefit by new nfpa compliant packs?
-
01-16-2006, 06:01 PM #3MembersZone Subscriber
- Join Date
- Jan 2005
- Posts
- 3,626
Wolf8552,
The project would be not be viable for one reason. The SCBAs are already NFPA compliant to current standards. They would be wasting their time, since the application probably would not get past the computer scoring. You would be stating that the SCBA are 100% compliant to the current standard.
Their other reasons along with non-compliant SCBA would have been a very viable project. At this point they need to come up with a new project.
-
01-16-2006, 10:54 PM #4
Seeing the amount of physical fitness equipment that was awarded (as a high priority
) put in for it, you'll probably be awarded.
"This thread is being closed as it is off-topic and not related to the fire industry." - Isn't that what the Off Duty forum was for?
-
01-17-2006, 12:46 AM #5Forum Member
- Join Date
- Jul 2005
- Location
- Oregon
- Posts
- 119
I guess I should clarify.
They are not intending on replacing their old nfpa compliant packs. They would like to convert their Scott Air Pack-Fifty 2.2's to 4.5's. And to replace their 3600psi cascade systems to 6000psi.
-
01-17-2006, 09:01 AM #6
It won't happen. Too many departments in non-complaint packs that are still 10-15 years of age. Switch tactics.
Kurt Bradley
Public Safety Grants Consultant
"Never Trade Skill for Luck"
-
01-17-2006, 01:58 PM #7FH Mag/.com Contributor
- Join Date
- Feb 2002
- Location
- Cypress, TX
- Posts
- 7,288
Ditto. As Bugle said, the packs are already NFPA compliant, the litmus test that DHS uses for calculating need. 100% of the SCBA are NFPA compliant, there is no "need" for grant funds to make them compliant. Upgrading non-compliant to compliant is the only way that will be funded. Upgrading/replacing the cascade is viable if it's old, but not without having the need to fill high pressure bottles. So if going for the 4.5s was the only reason for needing the new cascade/compressor, then that's out too.
- Brian
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Similar Threads
-
High vs Low pressure HURST
By firefighterox in forum University of ExtricationReplies: 13Last Post: 01-07-2005, 12:13 AM -
Thermal Imaging SOG's
By wtfd92 in forum Firefighters ForumReplies: 23Last Post: 06-27-2001, 08:41 PM -
Rescue Tool
By C601 in forum University of ExtricationReplies: 16Last Post: 11-07-2000, 07:19 AM -
High pressure airbags
By renegade in forum University of ExtricationReplies: 4Last Post: 10-30-2000, 11:19 PM -
HIGH PRESSURE LIFTING BAGS
By BTALLCHIEF in forum University of ExtricationReplies: 5Last Post: 03-18-2000, 10:30 PM

LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks




