1. #1
    Forum Member
    bjlffire's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Location
    Ne Missouri
    Posts
    342

    Default CEDAP II status definitions

    Does anyone know what the definitions of the application status are?
    (submitted, confirmed,ect)

  2. #2
    MembersZone Subscriber

    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Out and About
    Posts
    954

    Default

    SUBMITTED = original application submitted by author

    CONFIRMED = original application approved by head of agency

    RESUBMITTED = application revised and resubmitted due to your SAA not concuring with your application

    RECONFIRMED = revised application approved by your head of agency

    SAA CONCUR = Your states administrative agency believe your application conforms with the state's homeland security strategy

    SAA NON-CONCUR = Your states administrative agency DOES NOT believe your application conforms with the state's homeland strategy

    SAA = State Administrative Agency

  3. #3
    Forum Member
    Not2L84U2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Catlin, IL, USA
    Posts
    958

    Default

    K3,

    Any idea who our SAA would be? IEMA, OSFM?? Just curious
    Last edited by Not2L84U2; 01-19-2006 at 07:38 AM.

  4. #4
    FH Mag/.com Contributor

    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Location
    Cypress, TX
    Posts
    7,288

    Default

    The SAA is usually listed in the Homeland Security Grant Program Guidance. But if it's not it should be out on their web site.

    - Brian

  5. #5
    Forum Member
    bjlffire's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Location
    Ne Missouri
    Posts
    342

    Default

    On the status page I have a note where the "SAA Concurs"
    What might this mean?

  6. #6
    FH Mag/.com Contributor

    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Location
    Cypress, TX
    Posts
    7,288

    Default

    The SAA agrees that what you have stated is true where you claimed compliance with the state's homeland security initiatives. Same type of check they do in the AFG when people check the Critical Infrastructure box.

  7. #7
    MembersZone Subscriber
    ktb9780's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Auburndale, FL
    Posts
    6,081

    Default

    List for SAA Homeland Security -

    http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/odp/contact_state.htm
    Kurt Bradley
    Public Safety Grants Consultant

    "Never Trade Skill for Luck"

  8. #8
    MembersZone Subscriber

    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Out and About
    Posts
    954

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Not2L84U2
    K3,

    Any idea who our SAA would be? IEMA, OSFM?? Just curious
    IEMA


    [this message intentionally inserted to meet the 10 character minimum] (*&#@*&(@#*&(@#&*(@#&*(@#&(*@#&*(@#&*(#@*&(@#@#(* &

  9. #9
    Forum Member
    Not2L84U2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Catlin, IL, USA
    Posts
    958

    Default

    Thanks, got it off of Kurt's link also.

  10. #10
    Forum Member

    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Marion, Mississippi
    Posts
    144

    Default

    We recieved confirmation and it said:
    "This acknowledges your confirmation of the subject CEDAP Application.
    Notifications have been sent to the SAA, the State Technical Point of Contact,
    and the ODP Preparedness Officer.
    If no contrary action is taken by the SAA, this application will be forwarded
    for evaluation. If the SAA non-concurs for any reason, you will be notified by
    email.
    Thank you for your participation in the CEDAP program."


    We have not heard further since November.

    Is this a bad sign or what?????

  11. #11
    MembersZone Subscriber
    ktb9780's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Auburndale, FL
    Posts
    6,081

    Default

    No , not bad news, it is the normal message. It means you have done everything right so far. sit back and wait.
    Kurt Bradley
    Public Safety Grants Consultant

    "Never Trade Skill for Luck"

  12. #12
    MembersZone Subscriber
    ktb9780's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Auburndale, FL
    Posts
    6,081

    Default

    Just a note in this thead for those interested but, my conatct at RKB emailed me and stated that they had 4000 applications recieved for the Phase II program. Good luck to everyone!
    Kurt Bradley
    Public Safety Grants Consultant

    "Never Trade Skill for Luck"

  13. #13
    Forum Member

    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    PA Dutch Country
    Posts
    18

    Default CEDAP Confirmed status note

    A quick question-

    Anyone know if it means anything to have a comment "Forwarded for Consideration " by RTK staff? I see this when I click on my app's Confirmed status link and it comes after the SAA Concur comment.

    I'm thinking it may just mean it passed all the checks and balances to even be looked at, but would hope that it would mean something even better (like we are on our way to get the grant). We went for the HAZMAT PDA.

    BTW- has anyone tried to update their profile recently? Mine got hosed and it gives me an error when I try to update it.

  14. #14
    FH Mag/.com Contributor

    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Location
    Cypress, TX
    Posts
    7,288

    Default

    It means you're on to the next level of consideration for award. The SAA is the State Administrative Agency, responsible for saying yay or nay that your situation is what it is as you stated in your application. They agreed that whatever risks and needs you have are true, and agree that you should be funded. No guarantee that RTK will give it to you, but you're a lot further along than most.

  15. #15
    MembersZone Subscriber
    ktb9780's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Auburndale, FL
    Posts
    6,081

    Default

    And just my 2 cents worth but bc79er has that statement right on target. Keep your fingers corssed your looking pretty good. Be patient.
    Kurt Bradley
    Public Safety Grants Consultant

    "Never Trade Skill for Luck"

  16. #16
    MembersZone Subscriber

    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Out and About
    Posts
    954

    Default

    Interesting.... ours says "Forwarded for consideration" also.

  17. #17
    MembersZone Subscriber

    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    NW Indiana
    Posts
    1,419

    Default

    It's kind of a circle--all submitted applications were sent to the SAA for concurrence. Those that were "non-concurred" had a chance to edit and gain concurrence. Now the twist...any applications that were confirmed, sent to SAA, and not non-concurred as of 1-27 (i think, check the shut-down timeline on the RKB site) were forwarded for consideration without concurrence by the SAA.
    Moral of the story...unless the SAA applied the "non-concur" status, nothing had to be done by the SAA. No response from SAA had the same effect as "SAA-Concur" and was moved up the ladder. In that case, the status remained "Confirmed" but the chain of custody was updated.
    Good luck to all.
    earl

  18. #18
    Forum Member

    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Marion, Mississippi
    Posts
    144

    Default

    Great!!!!!!!!!!

    Now the RKB site (aren't they private) says my login is invalid and I can't even log on to check my status.

    I sent them e-mails but it's not working yet.

    I wish the Govt. would just run it's own websites and take care of it's own programs.

  19. #19
    FH Mag/.com Contributor

    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Location
    Cypress, TX
    Posts
    7,288

    Default

    I hope not, we'd never get anything done. When it comes to technology the feds are the last to see it. I read an article in CIO magazine last year about the failed attempt to consolidate the FBI's application systems. Ends up that almost half of the field offices either had no computers, or were working with 486s or slower that couldn't handle any of the newly proposed applications.

    There was a new round of hacking going on. IACOJ's web site was hit, and my email provider lost Address Books for a good part of yesterday. Nerds with nothing to do.

  20. #20
    Forum Member

    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Marion, Mississippi
    Posts
    144

    Default

    Is there some trick or link I'm missing to check the status of our app?

    I click the "check status" link and it redirects me to the same page as the link.

  21. #21
    MembersZone Subscriber

    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    NW Indiana
    Posts
    1,419

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MarionMedic
    Is there some trick or link I'm missing to check the status of our app?

    I click the "check status" link and it redirects me to the same page as the link.
    Pop-up blocker?? When you click the link under "current status" the status record comes up in a small pop-up box. if you have a blocker, you'll never see it unless you turn off the pop-up blocker or allow it as an exception in your software. just a thought...
    earl

  22. #22
    MembersZone Subscriber

    Join Date
    May 2000
    Location
    SW MO
    Posts
    4,249

    Default

    Anyone by chance hear anything recent on when they plan on announcing the grants? Still mid to late March?

  23. #23
    MembersZone Subscriber

    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Location
    Southwestern, Pa
    Posts
    178

    Default

    Anyone every hear how many applicants there were and about how many grantees there are to be?
    BB

  24. #24
    MembersZone Subscriber

    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Out and About
    Posts
    954

    Default

    Has anyone heard any further updates? Any emails or phone calls regarding apps?

  25. #25
    MembersZone Subscriber

    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    NW Indiana
    Posts
    1,419

    Default

    No change in ours since it was forwarded. Mid to late March was the target, so i'm looking a few times a day now. Maybe i should do something more productive??? Good luck!!
    earl

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Should Chris Kangas get LODD Status?
    By rfcmitch in forum Fire Explorer & Jr. Firefighting
    Replies: 79
    Last Post: 05-28-2007, 04:21 PM
  2. CEDAP Phase II
    By bukstpsear in forum Federal FIRE ACT Grants & Funding
    Replies: 42
    Last Post: 12-29-2005, 12:08 AM
  3. Post your status
    By Almarante51 in forum Federal FIRE ACT Grants & Funding
    Replies: 107
    Last Post: 01-14-2003, 08:23 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Log in

Click here to log in or register