What brand of class A foam do you use and have you found it to be excessively corrosive?
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 14 of 14
Thread: Class A foam
-
01-31-2006, 09:30 AM #1Forum Member
- Join Date
- Jan 2006
- Posts
- 48
Class A foam
-
01-31-2006, 11:55 AM #2MembersZone Subscriber
- Join Date
- Aug 2004
- Posts
- 55
We use Angus Hi-Combat. Ph is 9. Some cheaper brands can be higher. Do your research and be careful what you buy. We tested one with a ph of 12.
-
01-31-2006, 12:45 PM #3Forum Member
- Join Date
- Jan 2006
- Posts
- 48
Anybody have any experience with Sil-vex from Ansul?
-
01-31-2006, 01:16 PM #4MembersZone Subscriber
- Join Date
- Aug 2004
- Posts
- 55
The ph for sil-vex is around 8 but it also has a fair bit of alcohol in the concentrate. If you look at the msds it actually has a moderate flammability rating with a flashpoint of around 100F.
-
01-31-2006, 10:33 PM #5Forum Member
- Join Date
- Jan 2001
- Location
- Madison, NJ USA
- Posts
- 159
Hi FF4020,
My department uses Phos-Chek WD-881. Have been using it since 1998. We are very happy with it. We use it for CAFS and aspirating operations. Whatever Class "A " foam you do use, it should be on the US Forestry List of "approved" Class "A" foams. Their Quilified Product List, QPL is what it is referred to as. All of the Claas "A" foams listed on this list are "enviormentaly" friendly. Here is the link for the QPL list. http://www.fs.fed.us/rm/fire/wildland_chemicals.htm
By the way WD-881 not only works great, but has a nice "orange" smell to it.
Hope this helps.
Captain Lou
"Got Foam?"
-
02-01-2006, 07:25 AM #6MembersZone Subscriber
- Join Date
- Aug 2001
- Location
- Franklin, Va.
- Posts
- 57
We use USFoam class a foam. It is very inexpensive and havent had any corrosion problems. www.usfoam.com
-
02-11-2006, 04:23 AM #7Forum Member
- Join Date
- Jan 2006
- Location
- Houston, Texas
- Posts
- 43
Class A
Good advice, Capt Lou.
Originally Posted by CaptLou
One of the USDA QPL's toughest requirements is the corrosion tests.
Careful on the WD-881 smell though, their MSDS claims toxicity issues. I think its the only class A with toxicity warnings.
Personally, I like the National Foam Knockdown. No toxicity, its biodegradable, contains no alcohols to react with AR concentrates, and makes stiff CAFs foam at .01%.
JT
-
02-14-2006, 08:18 PM #8MembersZone Subscriber
- Join Date
- Aug 2004
- Posts
- 55
Knockdown and Hi-Combat are the same foam
-
02-14-2006, 08:53 PM #9Forum Member
- Join Date
- Jul 2005
- Posts
- 956
Don't remember our brand, I'll post later.....It's fairly corrosive, it eats away our level sensors in the foam tank, in all our engines EXCEPT, our HME
The best truck in the fleet IMO.
FF/NREMT-B
FTM-PTB!!
Brass does not equal brains.
Courage is not the absence of fear, but rather the ability to control it.
-
02-15-2006, 03:45 PM #10MembersZone Subscriber
- Join Date
- Mar 2002
- Location
- Loco madidus effercio in rutilus effercio.
- Posts
- 12,819
Malahat VFD uses Spitfire Class A most of the time. Not sure about ph levels though. Never seemed to be an issue. I tried to find a link in Acklands Granger because that is who supplied the last lot that I picked up for the station last Spring.... They only show Angus foam online.
If you don't do it RIGHT today, when will you have time to do it over? (Hall of Fame basketball player/coach John Wooden)
"I may be slow, but my work is poor." Chief Dave Balding, MVFD
"Its not Rocket Science. Just use a LITTLE imagination."
(Me)
Get it up. Get it on. Get it done!
impossible solved cotidie. miracles postulo viginti - quattuor hora animadverto
IACOJ member: Cheers, Play safe y'all.
-
02-20-2006, 04:26 PM #11Forum Member
- Join Date
- Jul 2002
- Location
- Arizona
- Posts
- 481
We also use WD 881, with excellent results to date. We also have to use foam from the Forest Service list, since we go to some of their fires.
-
02-21-2006, 11:36 AM #12Forum Member
- Join Date
- Oct 2005
- Posts
- 1,154
Silvex.
Have had trucks with it since 1995, no significant problems that weren't related to human error (do not use AFFF to top off the foam tank
)
However, the tanks are all poly.
The minipumper does have some cosmetic corrosion on the diamond plate below the foam injection mechanism, where a small amount of foam drips when it's running. Certainly nothing structurally damaging, just looks like crap.
-
02-21-2006, 12:27 PM #13MembersZone Subscriber
- Join Date
- May 2004
- Posts
- 47
We get all the USFoam we want. The owner is our board president.
Originally Posted by hvfd507
-
02-21-2006, 03:19 PM #14MembersZone Subscriber
- Join Date
- Dec 2005
- Posts
- 56
foam
anybody have any experience w/ chemguard?
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Similar Threads
-
ISO Consultant ?
By thoskin in forum Volunteer ForumReplies: 52Last Post: 01-27-2011, 11:00 AM -
World Of Fire Report: 10-04-05
By PaulBrown in forum World of Fire Daily ReportReplies: 0Last Post: 10-12-2005, 07:28 AM -
FOAM! Or, hey, things change!
By Dalmatian90 in forum Fireground TacticsReplies: 14Last Post: 10-17-2002, 07:56 PM -
AFFF or FFFP
By Lallo in forum Firefighters ForumReplies: 6Last Post: 03-18-2002, 08:34 PM -
RFP's
By D Littrell in forum Apparatus InnovationReplies: 1Last Post: 09-08-2000, 06:36 PM

LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks



