FDNY to install GPS in rigs
Keep in mind that if what they are really saying is true about cutting 33 seconds off and that is their real intent, then good for the the mayor. I am a techie by trade and love gps and its capabilities but with it comes the "big brother is watching" when you can see the rigs moving around on a map. "Hey why you still at the deli?"
It just amazes me that rescue rope bail out kits were removed originally and stations are closed due to funding issues, but look ma' its magic we found this cash to put GPS in all ems and fire rigs. It just scares me on the what's next front. I just fear "hey we always know where you are so just stay mobil all day and we'll close up a few more stations to pay for the project.
Again, I love technology and the good things it has to offer us as far as mapping/routing, hydrant locations, evac zone planning for hazmat clouds, etc, but for once I found something that sort of scares me in its underlying motivation.
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 20 of 33
Thread: FDNY GPS Units
04-20-2006, 03:36 PM #1
FDNY GPS Units
04-20-2006, 03:39 PM #2
The Big Brother aspect should not be an issue. In is a public service job paid for by the public. If you are scared to stand up to scrutiny of your habits, than either fix those habits or find another job.
04-20-2006, 03:45 PM #3
- Join Date
- Nov 2003
I always giggle when people say "Well, -this- got funded, but why not this?" I used to have the same complaints until I started writing grants for my agency... lo and behlod, it really is true... you go where the money is. In today's "Homeland Security" era, money abounds (but it getting slimmer) for various things. I'd wager FDNY found a DHS grant of some kind and nabbed it.
(Of course, there's always the trick of hiding in a parking garage... "Sorry,boss, GPS must not be working today. :-D)
Last edited by ResQUrCat4Free; 04-20-2006 at 03:47 PM. Reason: I can't spell worth a damn...
04-20-2006, 03:47 PM #4
Originally Posted by FFTrainer
- Join Date
- May 1999
- Here, There, Everywhere
04-20-2006, 03:49 PM #5
Originally Posted by ResQUrCat4Free
- Join Date
- May 1999
- Here, There, Everywhere
04-20-2006, 04:22 PM #6
We've got them on all of our rigs. I haven't heard anyone here complain that "Big Brother is watching!"
As far as being dispatched by GPS....I can recall a few times being at the store at the same time as other companies, a run would come in that would normally be ours, but because the other rig is literally 30' closer than we were...they'd get booked for that run. And sometimes the reverse.
I didn't read the article yet. Did, by chance, this money come about by grants? What are their main objectives to put them on the fire companies if CAD is not hooked up to them?
04-20-2006, 04:44 PM #7Originally Posted by FFFRED
What happens if E40 is stolen from the shops by a terror group FDNY will know where it is.ALL GAVE SOME BUT SOME GAVE ALL
NEVER FORGET 9-11-01
CAPT. Frank Callahan Ladder 35 *
LT. John Ginley Engine 40
FF. Bruce Gary Engine 40
FF. Jimmy Giberson Ladder 35
FF. Michael Otten Ladder 35 *
FF. Steve Mercado Engine 40 *
FF. Kevin Bracken Engine 40 *
FF. Vincent Morello Ladder 35
FF. Michael Roberts Ladder 35 *
FF. Michael Lynch Engine 40
FF. Michael Dauria Engine 40
"If my job was easy a cop would be doing it."
04-20-2006, 05:11 PM #8
When done right things like this really tend to work out good for a system from what I understand. But nobody likes change so it'll be intersting to watch how it rolls out.
04-20-2006, 06:57 PM #9
I remember the talk about this when I was a dispatcher in FDNY/EMS. The REAL reason behind it....IMO is b/c most units lie about thier status to slack off between runs. A unit will show 81 x's 1 hour (at the hospital, unaval for a run) and in reality they are at thier CSL getting a bit to eat...basically they are holding a signal intentionally. This whole system is about micromanagement only. I can tell you that when a segment 1-3 job come in...(arrest, Trauma...."the real hero sh*t" ) everyone and thier brother magically becomes available and is closer.....and most will respond in anyway. I don't believe a word of what was written for the papers.......it allllll about big brother.IACOJ Member
04-21-2006, 01:50 AM #10
no more going into stealth mode to leave districts to go get food outside of your district
04-21-2006, 02:36 AM #11
I agree that it will do more help than harm. I also agree with the idea that maybe sometimes you need to change your habits sometimes when it comes to going outside of your area or staying busy on purpose so you can get a break and do what you want to go and screw off somewhere, that's not right. If a company is working so hard or is so busy that they can't get a break for chow or pottie, then they should be taken out of service for rehab.
But....a steel or aluminum salad bowl over the little antenna and all of sudden you disappear. Seen it happen in another department where a buddy of mine said they carry a salad bowl if they have to stop at someone's house or go into stealth mode for a bit.
From what I have seen just now, it looks like a Homeland Security grant.
04-21-2006, 09:22 AM #12Originally Posted by VinnieB
Now, if you have units slacking off between runs, and calling unavailable when they really should be available for any runs, then yes, management needs to be more active in their lives, to ensure that the employees are doing their job properly and not slacking off.
bottom line, if you have nothing to hide, and aren't doing anything you shouldn't be doing (ie, stuff that isn't permitted by the rules), then you shouldn't have any problem with having your apparatus location tracked.
but if you are doing stuff that you shouldn't be doing, and you don't want management to know about, then absolutely be up in arms about the GPS tracking.
Into which group do you fit into?If my basic HazMat training has taught me nothing else, it's that if you see a glowing green monkey running away from something, follow that monkey!
04-21-2006, 11:02 AM #13
- Join Date
- Nov 2003
GPS helped Toronto follow their pumper when it was "borrowed". We have it where I work and it has helped the crew responding find their way more times then for management to use it as a tracking tool.
04-21-2006, 11:17 AM #14Originally Posted by DrParasite
You are taking Vinnies words out of context. He was referring to EMS, not our FD.
If we travel to our 2nd or 3rd due area, to the FH with our EMS depot, we park IFO their qtrs. Nothing outside of the rules there. Now if there is a fire reported in the other engine company's response area, WE will be given the run, instead of the company we parked in front of, because technically we are about 15 feet closer. You are saving roughly 1 second of response time, but are putting the members in a lot more danger. If the building we are now responding to is a rehab, or some other weird situation (which we run into EVERY day), the other engine company would know the ins and outs of this building. But because we are now responding instead of them, we are without this information, and can cause a significant delay in rescues, and more importantly, a delay in water getting on the fire.
You must also remember, Bloomturd and his cronies are saying this will help response times, and that every second counts. But yet magically, closing 6 companies does not increase response times at all. Weird, huh?Proud East Coast Traditionalist.
04-21-2006, 11:20 AM #15Originally Posted by CdnFyreGuy
It has its huge pluses. We have coordinates of all our hydrants and draft sites recorded and while it doesn't track us like a blip on a radar it does give us direct routing to the nearest hydrant (hopefully a working one!)
I know we are here to 'serve' the public, but we are also here to stay here and go home to our spouse and kids. How a monumental project such as this gets funded to help us get to the call faster yet the equipment to help us (you know the city insured employees) to go home safely from the run gets cut and only brought back after guys get killed. Its just frustrating that management originated projects get money but field originated ideas get squashed.
04-21-2006, 11:20 AM #16Originally Posted by Dickey
Just remember that there is a difference in EMS and FDNY. This was done IMO for EMS not FDNY. We sit in firehouses they don't. They have to sit on street corners in a 4 block by 4 block area.
They are alound whats called a "100" (radio signal 10-100). Its thier meal time. BUT they can make themsselves available or unavailable....most of the time they are unaval. They have time and are aloud to take bathroom breaks too.....in an available status. The problem is that the way the disptach CAD sees it is different. Once they make themselves unavailalbe they are taken out of the active status on the CAD.....and placed in a different screen with all the other units that are either on a run, at the hospital, or oos for whatever else. When its busy and it always is....a dispatcher constantly has to find aval units (the CAD does it automatically, but it is up the the dispatcher to keep on the unaval units...make them go 10-98 or 10-97).IACOJ Member
04-21-2006, 03:50 PM #17
- Join Date
- Dec 2002
- Rural Iowa
In total, 1,565 Fire and EMS vehicles throughout the City will be equipped with AVL at a cost of nearly $50 million.
Thats $31948 EACH! How could you possibly spend (or justify) that? Similar units have been in truck for years and can't imagine any truckline would blow that kind of money as an add on to a $75000 tractor.
04-21-2006, 03:55 PM #18
Originally Posted by neiowa
- Join Date
- Mar 2006
04-21-2006, 05:06 PM #19Originally Posted by chopper12
Originally Posted by Dickey
04-22-2006, 05:04 AM #20
I know what you mean. I do the same thing here with my police units all the time. They are always busy for the barking dogs or stupid child custody problems but once an armed robbery or a big fight come out, boy, they all go available quick for the "cool" calls. I feel their pain (on a smaller scale of course)
The metal salad bowl works perfect, so I have been told, at least until your discovered to be off the screen.
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
By Nail200 in forum Firefighters ForumReplies: 259Last Post: 07-07-2007, 04:11 PM
By PaulBrown in forum World of Fire Daily ReportReplies: 0Last Post: 05-07-2005, 10:37 PM
By PaulBrown in forum World of Fire Daily ReportReplies: 0Last Post: 04-22-2005, 08:01 AM
By PaulBrown in forum World of Fire Daily ReportReplies: 0Last Post: 06-30-2004, 11:27 AM
By harlemBrother in forum Firefighters ForumReplies: 3Last Post: 02-02-2002, 07:41 PM