The Pierce Fire Apparatus Co. has a new 100- foot Heavy Duty Aluminum Aerial Ladder that delivers a dry tip - load rating of 750 - pounds with a additional 100 - pounds capacity at the tip for fire fighter equipment. The new ladder is rated to 500- pounds while flowing up to 1500 gallons per minute !...
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 20 of 23
-
04-29-2006, 05:51 PM #1Forum Member
- Join Date
- Oct 2005
- Location
- Woodbridge Twp, New Jersey
- Posts
- 863
E-One & Sutphen get competition ?
-
04-29-2006, 07:09 PM #2Forum Member
- Join Date
- Jul 1999
- Location
- Rural Wisconsin, work in the burbs of Milwaukee
- Posts
- 8,110
Golly, and after how many decades of telling fire departments that aluminum was not a good choice for aerials?
Things that make you go hmmmmm?
FyredUp
-
04-29-2006, 07:58 PM #3Forum Member
- Join Date
- Oct 2005
- Location
- Woodbridge Twp, New Jersey
- Posts
- 863
You are 100 % right , it only took " Pierce " 25 -30 years to figure out the Aluminum ladder construction idea . Maybe the " Seagrave " fire apparatus LLC will be the next one to build a Aluminum Ladder. It's all about the big bucks $$$$$.
Originally Posted by FyredUp
-
04-29-2006, 11:47 PM #4MembersZone Subscriber
- Join Date
- Nov 1999
- Posts
- 820
You beat me to it FyredUp. I agree 110%. For 20 plus years E-One has been the dolts and idiots using inferior aluminum to build aerials instead of the far superior steel. LOL. Now, when it is convenient they build aerials out of aluminum. And it is an E-One design to boot. LOL. Ah, the irony.
Maybe ALF/LTI will figure it out. They built stainless aerials, maybe they'll switch to aluminum also. LOL.Stay low and move it in.
Be safe.
Larry
-
04-30-2006, 04:47 AM #5Forum Member
- Join Date
- Mar 2003
- Location
- Madison, WI
- Posts
- 5
Well, ya have to admit, it was only a matter of time. As soon as Pierce released "their" 75' aluminum stick, you had to figure that a 100' was somewhere in the works. The way things are working, I'd bet that this time next year we'll be discussing the release of a Pierce aluminum platform aerial or mid-mount.
Aside from buying E-One out or, gasp, lowering their prices, adding what their competition already offers is about the only way they'll be able to get any more new customers.
-
04-30-2006, 12:09 PM #6Forum Member
- Join Date
- Jan 2003
- Posts
- 232
The way a person makes in the business world is to do what the competition does, but only better. If they build one a month, which they will, that's one that E-One, and Sutphen isn't selling. Pierce is the number 1 seller of trucks, so why not build on that.
-
04-30-2006, 12:26 PM #7Temporarily Inactive
- Join Date
- Apr 2006
- Posts
- 39
I read the posts on here about the change to aluminum after years of opposing it. One factor nobody has mentioned is this: Since Pierce has become a subsidiary of the Oshkosh Company they have had to do things that maybe they don't like. The Contender model out of Bradenton, Florida is from an Oshkosh facility already in existence before the purchase of the Pierce Company. So the new owners said they wanted a low-end custom apparatus out of their Florida factory. They got it. A Saber cab on a basic design with some options.
Some of the early deliveries were less than what Appleton was noted for in quality so the purchasers were unhappy with the Bradenton works. Evidently things have improved down that way. Possibly the desicion on the new aluminum 100 'was forced by Oshkosh. Regardless, the past claims were purely Pierce as regards aerials of steel versus aerials of aluminum. Now with Oshkosh running the works Pierce must eat some crow because that is what the new owners demand in order to market the new products they feel will put them at the cutting edge and claim that portion of market share as their own.
-
04-30-2006, 02:33 PM #8Forum Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2005
- Posts
- 498
Is thier anything wrong with alumimum? The advantage I see it has over steel is less weight. Im sure it heats up faster too.
-
04-30-2006, 04:30 PM #9
Aluminum fatigues. (Think about that next time you're in an airplane!)
ullrichk
a.k.a.
perfesser
a ship in a harbor is safe. . . but that's not what ships are for
-
04-30-2006, 04:47 PM #10Forum Member
- Join Date
- Oct 2005
- Location
- Woodbridge Twp, New Jersey
- Posts
- 863
There are many old timers out there from vol fire departments who say that the strongest aerials are made of " Steel " . They would never buy a aerial made from " Alumimum " , Our Mack Aerialscope is built from Alumimum with 3 of the last boom sections & platform , the first main boom section & turret assembly are steel.
Originally Posted by Ledebuhr1
-
04-30-2006, 05:39 PM #11Forum Member
- Join Date
- Feb 2004
- Posts
- 355
There's oldtimers out there from career departments that say the same thing.
-
04-30-2006, 08:17 PM #12MembersZone Subscriber
- Join Date
- Dec 2002
- Location
- Illinois
- Posts
- 44
Aluminum fatigues. (Think about that next time you're in an airplane!)
The best thing to do is write all the major airline companies and discuss with them the reasons why should build their planes from carbon steel and weld the joints. If they listen, see how high you will climb and what happens when it does not flex. Think about that !
There is room for both types of construction in the fire service, each provide unique design methods. I am sure we will see a lot of cloning in the near future in the quest to eliminate the competition.
-
04-30-2006, 09:21 PM #13Forum Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2005
- Posts
- 498
Is there really something wrong with aluminium or is steel prefered because of tradition? Have all these old timers ever used an aluminum ladder? Or do they believe in the phrase, "Thats the way its always been, so thats they way it always be".
-
04-30-2006, 09:25 PM #14
Everyone says Pierce copied an E-ONE design, but their 75 has a 850 tip capacity vs. 550 lb. on the E-ONE.
The Pierce 100 has an 850 lb. tip capacity vs. 800 for a CR100 and 500+whatever the equipment allowance is on a HP100.
So while you bash Pierce for "copying" the E-ONE design, you fail to mention that the Pierce ladder actually has a higher capacity.
Oh well, neither can match a Sutphen 75.FTM - PTB
-
04-30-2006, 11:47 PM #15Forum Member
- Join Date
- May 2004
- Posts
- 43
I agree that once Pierce came out with their 75' model, the 100' had to be close behind. I would imagine that within the next year or two, you will see a Pierce 100' aluminum platform.
I just returned from FDIC and found it interesting that this is the first time in the fire industry that if you wanted to see an aluminum aerial ladder at the FDIC, you had to go to the Pierce booth, not E-One! Hmmmmmm, interesting. All E-One had for aerial devices were three Bronto's in varying lengths. Why were there no aerials?? I hope they are not banking their revival on the sales of Bronto's. We'll be adding their name to the History books as well.
The Pierce 100' aluminum looked nice. The outrigger stance is only 12' shoe-to-shoe. it also has a removeable egress tip. Outrigger controls are very simple and there is no pinning of the vertical outriggers. It had a stainless steel body with plenty of compartment space.
As for this aluminum vs. steel discussion, blah, blah, blah. FDNY has been using aluminum Aerialscopes for over 30+ years without any failures or damage from heat. If you want an aluminum aerial device, then great, now you have two choices. If you want a steel device, then great, you have multiple choices. They both have their limits and pros & cons.
Let's move on to a discussion that will affect ALL OF US, like the '07 EPA engine requirements. Enough of the aluminum vs steel. It's getting old!!!!
Just my .02 worth!
Stay low & Stay Safe!!
-
04-30-2006, 11:59 PM #16
Three...
Originally Posted by bgcjmc
FTM - PTB
-
05-01-2006, 07:29 PM #17Forum Member
- Join Date
- May 2004
- Posts
- 43
Ok, I'll bite - what is the third? Please don't tell me Sutphen. If that is the answer, then ket me re-phrase my statement by saying "for rear-mount aluminum aerial devices, you now have two choices".
I really don't count Sutphen a player in the aerial ladder market. Aerial platforms, yes.
-
05-01-2006, 07:48 PM #18
Why not?
http://www.sutphen.com/Sutphen%20gallery/gallery.htm
There seems to be quite a few Sutphen ladders in service.FTM - PTB
-
05-01-2006, 10:43 PM #19
Sutphen Not A Player????????!!!!!!!!
Wow,
That has to be the most ludicris statement I have read on these forums!! So you think that having the HIGHEST RATED aerials out there excludes them as a player??? Again - WOW!! So, having a record of producing 0 (yes, thats a zero) aerials that have dropped firefighters from the sky exludes them as a player?? WOW!! Not saying that that Pierce and E-One don't build great aerials, but your statement sounds completely biased and mis-informed. Not a dig on you, just a suggestion that you think - then type.
I have but one ambition in life and that is to become a firefighter.
-
05-01-2006, 11:46 PM #20Forum Member
- Join Date
- Oct 2002
- Location
- Between here and there
- Posts
- 71
I think what bgcjmc is saying is that Sutphen builds mostly Towers - not straight stick aerials. Yes, they do build two different 75' straight sticks and the 104' but most of the trucks I have seen from Sutphen are platforms.
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Similar Threads
-
Your Dept. Apparatus
By firedude3316 in forum Fire Explorer & Jr. FirefightingReplies: 39Last Post: 06-06-2005, 02:50 PM -
any big city explorers
By expvol in forum Fire Explorer & Jr. FirefightingReplies: 13Last Post: 04-05-2004, 07:49 PM -
Punta Gorda--State Fire Competition Brings out the BEST!
By captstanm1 in forum FloridaReplies: 0Last Post: 08-18-2003, 05:58 PM -
State Extrication Competition
By captstanm1 in forum FloridaReplies: 0Last Post: 05-25-2003, 05:26 PM -
Fire Exploring Competition
By fyrfyter33 in forum Fire Explorer & Jr. FirefightingReplies: 6Last Post: 12-07-2002, 05:32 PM

LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks



