1. #1
    MembersZone Subscriber
    ullrichk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Deleted by the forum gremlins
    Posts
    1,663

    Default How many SAFER grants are being turned down?

    My department and a neighboring department were awarded SAFER grants for 6 firefighters apiece. Both departments are likely to turn them down because of the cost to the municipalities. I'm just curious if this is turning out to be a common problem. Any other cases?
    ullrichk
    a.k.a.
    perfesser

    a ship in a harbor is safe. . . but that's not what ships are for

  2. #2
    Forum Member
    HeavyRescueTech's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    2,460

    Default

    not for nothing but why did you put in for a grant for the 6 firefighters if your municipality can't afford them?
    If my basic HazMat training has taught me nothing else, it's that if you see a glowing green monkey running away from something, follow that monkey!

    FF/EMT/DBP

  3. #3
    MembersZone Subscriber
    ullrichk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Deleted by the forum gremlins
    Posts
    1,663

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DrParasite
    not for nothing but why did you put in for a grant for the 6 firefighters if your municipality can't afford them?
    A fair question - and I don't know. I expect it was a case of "We don't stand a chance of getting this, but let's try anyway and worry about the matching funds if we get it."
    ullrichk
    a.k.a.
    perfesser

    a ship in a harbor is safe. . . but that's not what ships are for

  4. #4
    Forum Member

    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Location
    Louisa KY
    Posts
    402

    Default

    Yeah really. Sounds kinda pointless to apply for a grant if you cant support it. We applied for one for 3 firefighters the past couple years and havent heard a thing.
    "I truly believe that tradition is important to the long-term survival of the fire service."-Lt. Andrew Fredricks, FDNY,9-11-01

  5. #5
    MembersZone Subscriber

    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    3,761

    Default

    There have been quite a few SAFER grants that have been turned back in due to the financial committment required by the municipalities. Some of the cases involve departments that sent applications without the knowledge of the municipality. When a department recieves the award the municipality turns it down due to the financial impact. They refuse it to protect themselves from defaulting on the grant which impacts their ability to apply in the future.

    The biggest mistake is that departments do no read the program guidances carefully, before submitting an application.

    The 2006 SAFER PG states the following:

    The long-term nature of the eligible activities under these grants makes it essential that an applicant’s local governing body be involved in the application process. As such, each applicant certifies in their application that their governing body has been informed of the applicant’s intention to submit a SAFER grant request, that the local governing body acknowledges the commitment required for the grant if awarded, and that appropriate financial support will be secured for the applicant’s cost-sharing obligations.
    This is early on in the PG. Departments that ignore this part have been the ones to refuse the grant.

  6. #6
    Early Adopter
    cozmosis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 1999
    Location
    Arkansas
    Posts
    1,925

    Arrow

    I'd wish they'd shift some of the refused money towards us. We applied for three, which would give us enough people to split our one station into two companies... But have heard nothing.

  7. #7
    Forum Member
    DaSharkie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2000
    Posts
    4,713

    Default

    One thing that I have seen pop up with SAFER and FIRE Act is that chiefs are applying for these grants without running them by town or city councils first.

    Then they get approved by the Feds, and go to the town fathers and get chastised for doing so - as they should be.

    Get your ducks in a row before you do these things and you won't get smacked down.
    "Too many people spend money they haven't earned, to buy things they don't want, to impress people they don't like." Will Rogers

    The borrower is slave to the lender. Proverbs 22:7 - Debt free since 10/5/2009.

    "No man's life, liberty, or property are safe while the legislature is in session." - New York Judge Gideon Tucker

    "As Americans we must always remember that we all have a common enemy, an enemy that is dangerous, powerful and relentless. I refer, of course, to the federal government." - Dave Barry

    www.daveramsey.com www.clarkhoward.com www.heritage.org

  8. #8
    MembersZone Subscriber

    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Posts
    100

    Default Safer

    These grant requests shouldn't have even been considered without checking to see it they had gone through their municipal boards to begin with. They should have never made it out of the first review. :

  9. #9
    Forum Member
    DaSharkie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2000
    Posts
    4,713

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bummer
    These grant requests shouldn't have even been considered without checking to see it they had gone through their municipal boards to begin with. They should have never made it out of the first review. :

    Ding Ding Ding Ding Ding. Right on target man.

    Not necessarily a popular thought, but it is true.
    "Too many people spend money they haven't earned, to buy things they don't want, to impress people they don't like." Will Rogers

    The borrower is slave to the lender. Proverbs 22:7 - Debt free since 10/5/2009.

    "No man's life, liberty, or property are safe while the legislature is in session." - New York Judge Gideon Tucker

    "As Americans we must always remember that we all have a common enemy, an enemy that is dangerous, powerful and relentless. I refer, of course, to the federal government." - Dave Barry

    www.daveramsey.com www.clarkhoward.com www.heritage.org

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. SAFER Grants for VFD, suggestions
    By PATF1engineer in forum Federal FIRE ACT Grants & Funding
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 05-23-2006, 10:36 AM
  2. SAFER grants and VFD's
    By PrestoC1 in forum Federal FIRE ACT Grants & Funding
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 04-19-2006, 03:54 PM
  3. Safer Grants
    By QFD12ACA608 in forum Federal FIRE ACT Grants & Funding
    Replies: 95
    Last Post: 10-21-2005, 05:52 PM
  4. SAFER, who is actually going to use it?
    By neiowa in forum Firefighters Forum
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 09-28-2004, 03:26 PM
  5. SAFER ACT a reality?
    By DaSharkie in forum Firefighters Forum
    Replies: 52
    Last Post: 11-13-2003, 11:45 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Log in

Click here to log in or register