1. #1
    Forum Member

    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    39

    Default Our Grant was awarded but reduced...

    We received our 06 Grant for new turnout gear and a washer extractor but the amount was greatly reduced. I didn't object whatsoever as any funding is good funding.

    We had requested $5100 (based on quotes) for a washer/extractor that will clean 2-sets at a time. We also received $600 to upgrade our electrical circuits for the washer/extractor. We also received $2125 per person for a complete set of turnout gear including helmets, boots, flashlight, gear bag etc. We average 10 years per set before they can no longer be professionally cleaned and repaired by an authorized center.

    However FEMA reduced our award from 20 sets to 16 sets...and reduced the amount for a turnout set from $2521 to $2125.

    No major deal. As I stated we are very grateful to be able to have any new gear at all. We'll make it happen even if we have to buy 4 sets on our own.

    I'm assuming that 06 funds had to be stretched further than prior years. I know our neighboring department with similar statistics received enough last year to outfit everyone...plus 6 new spare sets for certain members.

    I'm just guessing they are trying to make the dollars go further. But like I said...I'd have been happy with 2 sets.

  2. #2
    MembersZone Subscriber

    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    3,748

    Default

    Congrats on the award.

    With good purchasing practices (shopping around or bidding) you should recieve pricing that may come under what you were quoted. The savings (excess funds) can be used to purchase additional TO or at least offset the cost.

    Based on what you wrote, you were looking for 4 spare sets of TO above and beyond what was needed to outfit the department. This would have caused conflict within your stats. We have 16 active firefighters. 0% meet current standards. 100% compliance, but you request 20 sets. Or you have 20 active firefighters, 20% (4) meet current standards, 100% compliance (need 16), but request 20 sets. Either way, it will get reduced, unless adequately justified in the narrative.
    Last edited by onebugle; 12-06-2006 at 09:23 AM.

  3. #3
    FH Mag/.com Contributor

    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Location
    Cypress, TX
    Posts
    7,288

    Default

    The limit on head to toe PPE was $2000 in prior years but with everyone making the DRDs already in anticipation of the standard, plus the price of kevlar going up they increased the price. Same with vehicle price limits increasing because of steel going up also.

    bugle has the possible reasons for the quantity reduction covered so no need to rehash.

  4. #4
    Forum Member
    SLY4420's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    1,974

    Default

    Were you notified of a reduction prior to the award announcement?

  5. #5
    Forum Member

    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    39

    Default

    We were fully aware of the reduction prior to the award. Either way was totally acceptable to me.

    We will do some serious price shopping as well as research. I know we had to do this for SCBA a few years back. We ended up saving thousands by going to a dealer on the east coast. Turned out to be a wonderful decision and we made great friends with the far away dealership.

    Our roster is normally 20...with bylaws allowing 24. We are unusually low at 16...but that is what I reported at the time the application was filled out.

    I know we can do the job with the amount given. Its just going to require more creative thinking. I didn't want to be "too creative" when we requested the amount. I was trying to cover all the bases a year ago.

    We are very pleased.

  6. #6
    Forum Member
    SLY4420's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    1,974

    Default

    Congratulations Chief.

    I must say that when I applied for 30 sets of gear earlier this year, we had 35 people on the roster. That has since come down slightly, and so have our IMMEDIATE needs. We HAVE to purchase 30 sets since that's what we were awarded for. Just like you, I'm finding that I may not be able to meet all 30 sets and stay within budget. We're talking a few dollars here, so we can probably spend the overage out of our savings (or better yet I'm trying to find a sponsor) and still meet the grant.

    We applied to outfit 30 out of 35 firefighters. The 5 firefighters who aren't being covered by this grant have had new gear purchased for them within the last 3-5 years. Everyone else's is older.

    At the time of the application, we needed 30 sets of BRAND NEW custom fit turnouts. Now I probably need 28. I will probably end up finding 2 of our guys who already had "acceptable" gear and fit them up, and donate their useable gear to someone else. The problem is that we were basically awarded because we met the program guidance - fitting everyone we had to 100% complaince. That number slightly changed since I applied, but we couldn't project that. We will still have 100% complaince, and another needy company will also make out at the same time. What a win for everybody!
    Last edited by SLY4420; 12-06-2006 at 05:07 PM.

  7. #7
    Forum Member

    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Udall, Kansas
    Posts
    436

    Default What washer/extractor are you getting

    2Cheif - what model/brand of extractor are you getting? We also were awarded for a washer/extractor and gear drying system.

  8. #8
    Forum Member

    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    South Carolina
    Posts
    53

    Default

    New 1199a on old award Oct 25
    10Qs on Oct 26
    Reduction notice on Dec 7 (D Day how inappropriate)
    They removed our accountability system and a few sets of t/o gear.
    We're still happy to get comm equipment, scba, and t/o gear.
    Have not received official award notification.

  9. #9
    Forum Member

    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    39

    Default

    During the initial phases of grant writing...we were getting prices on Unimac and Heubsch brands of washer extractors from "local" Indianapolis vendors.

  10. #10
    MembersZone Subscriber

    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    NW Indiana
    Posts
    1,419

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 2Chief
    During the initial phases of grant writing...we were getting prices on Unimac and Heubsch brands of washer extractors from "local" Indianapolis vendors.
    2Chief--e-mail me off-line (see profile) and i'll give you the name of our Unimac dealer up in South Bend. Might be worth a look for you.
    earl

  11. #11
    Forum Member

    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Goose Lake
    Posts
    24

    Default Turn Out Gear Reduction

    Received a e-mail asking if we would accept $1,375.00 for a set of turn-out pant & Coat instead of $1,500.00.


    Let me think for second........Oh alright well accept it.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. World Of Fire Report: 03-17-05
    By PaulBrown in forum World of Fire Daily Report
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 03-20-2005, 11:29 AM
  2. Grant Awarded?
    By axe331 in forum Federal FIRE ACT Grants & Funding
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 11-15-2004, 11:01 PM
  3. Numbers for 2004 Fire Act Grant and review of 2003 Numbers for Fire Act Grant
    By SamsonFCDES in forum Federal FIRE ACT Grants & Funding
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 02-20-2004, 04:23 AM
  4. PA Grant Writing Seminar
    By dragonfyre in forum Federal FIRE ACT Grants & Funding
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 02-12-2003, 09:45 PM
  5. When does the department know it has been awarded a FEMA grant?
    By Firefighter430 in forum Federal FIRE ACT Grants & Funding
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 08-19-2002, 11:03 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Log in

Click here to log in or register