Saddam Dead

[E229Lt]

Isn't that peachy?

Can we get back to Bin Laden now?

[RspctFrmCalgary]

No ***** hey!

[RspctFrmCalgary]

Wonder how long it will take for the pics to hit the net.

[Itsmy6]

I agree WTH happened with us looking for Osama.

[SAFD46Truck]

While I agree that finding Osama is a TOP priority..........the world is a better place tonight without that piece of ***** Saddam.

[FFFRED]

Out next objectives...

1. Osama
2. The Cast of the View
3. Kim Jong-il
4........


FTM-PTB

[MIKEYLIKESIT]

Bye Hussein.... This may be a tad late, but its a classic anyway.

[VinnieB]

Isn't that peachy?

Can we get back to Bin Laden now?

I understand you angst lou, but finding a guy in a barren place with no infastructure is alot harder than finding an established leader in an industrial country. Apples and oranges actually.....but please understand that we have our best looking for UBL.

[RspctFrmCalgary]

I think it never stopped.

Our soldiers are giving their lives in Afghanistan, so one would assume (hope) that their sacrifice is directly related to the quest to find Osama.

[mcaldwell]

I think it never stopped.

Our soldiers are giving their lives in Afghanistan, so one would assume (hope) that their sacrifice is directly related to the quest to find Osama.

You would hope, but even the Canadian leadership in-country is saying that there are not nearly enough resources to stabilize the place, let alone find Bin Laden. And to make it worse, the f-n Pakistani's have all but given up helping search, or even control their tribal regions where we know the little ba$tard is holed up.

Our pleas for more assistance from the EU have fell on deaf ears, and I have little hope of finding Osama while the US is tied up in Iraq. The majority of our "allies" in Afghanistan are to afraid too leave their friggin bases right now, let alone get anything useful done.

I don't know if you can tell, but it ****es me off a little.

[Uncharged]

Out next objectives...

1. Osama
2. The Cast of the View
3. Kim Jong-il
4........


FTM-PTB

#2. Thats just funny right there.

[FDAIC485]

I'd probably spare the chick that was on Survivor.

[Fawlty]

Geez, now we've gone and killed the only guy that could keep all of Iraq together and keep Al Queda out.. what are we going to do next, execute James Baker

And I'm sorry, imho the chick from 'The View' & 'Survivor' would be the first against the wall, sure she's eye candy compared to the rest, but between her voice and her incredibly stupid & naive opinions (beliefs).. sheesh (or could I be taking daytime TV way too seriously)

[fyrmnk]

Out next objectives...

1. Osama
2. The Cast of the View
3. Kim Jong-il
4........


FTM-PTB

Don't forget Hanoi ****

[VinnieB]

You would hope, but even the Canadian leadership in-country is saying that there are not nearly enough resources to stabilize the place, let alone find Bin Laden. And to make it worse, the f-n Pakistani's have all but given up helping search, or even control their tribal regions where we know the little ba$tard is holed up.

Our pleas for more assistance from the EU have fell on deaf ears, and I have little hope of finding Osama while the US is tied up in Iraq. The majority of our "allies" in Afghanistan are to afraid too leave their friggin bases right now, let alone get anything useful done.

I don't know if you can tell, but it ****es me off a little.

True, the SF community isn't designed or large enough to control territory. As soon as they leave an area, it falls back into AQ hands. Also, Canadian, UK and US troops seem to be the only ones going beyond thier bases. The French sit tight, and will be removing thier "SF" teams soon. Every other country really haven't sent or plan to sent much in the way of Offensive forces. Mostly supply/logistic and other support types.

[chuckbrooks]

There are a lot of other medium to large size fish out there that probably have more of a direct influence on things than UBL. And we were taking a ton of them down daily (at least while I was there). Just because it doesn't make the news doesn't mean the good guys aren't kicking *****.

[mcfd45]

Next in line t the 711 in the sky is saddam.

[rfdlou]

We need to be very careful who we support. Saddam, the enemy of our enemy could do no wrong in 1986. He was a p.o.s. then & untill the time the noose tightened around his neck.
The UN Security Council could only condemn Iraq by name for using chemical weapons through non-binding Presidential statements, over which permanent members of the Security Council do not have an individual veto. On 21 March 1986, the Security Council President, making a "declaration" and "speaking on behalf of the Security Council," stated that the Council members are "profoundly concerned by the unanimous conclusion of the specialists that chemical weapons on many occasions have been used by Iraqi forces against Iranian troops...[and] the members of the Council strongly condemn this continued use of chemical weapons in clear violation of the Geneva Protocol of 1925 which prohibits the use in war of chemical weapons". The United States voted against the issuance of this statement, and the UK, Australia, France and Denmark abstained. However, the concurring votes of the other ten members of the Security Council ensured that this statement constituted the first criticism of Iraq by the Security Council. A similar Presidential statement was made on 14 May 1987, which noted that the Council was "deeply dismayed" about the CW use against Iranian forces and civilians.

[ChiefReason]

Isn't that peachy?

Can we get back to Bin Laden now?

Stan knows where he is.
PakiSTAN, that is!
CR

[mcaldwell]

The videos have begun to leak if anyone is interested.

Proceed at your own risk.

The quality is crap, but it shows it all.

http://www.anwarweb.net/saddamdown.wmv

http://pandachute.com/videos/leaked_...ing_hung_video