Why register? ...To Enhance Your Experience
+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 10 1234 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 197
  1. #1
    MembersZone Subscriber
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Posts
    121

    Default Pierce Aerial failure??????

    First off i'm a fan of pierce and not attacking them just informing. I just saw on my local(WHDH ch. 7) news Boston Ladder 15 fully extended off the back of the truck where the last 25ft had bent and the ladder could not me retracted. A crane and flat bed was called to assist. The aerial was cut and the enitre unit has been returned to Pierce. Anyone else have any more details on this?


  2. #2
    MembersZone Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Pacific Northwest
    Posts
    517

    Default

    http://www1.whdh.com/news/articles/local/BO43864/

    Boston firefighters forced to send ladder back

    BOSTON -- Boston firefighters have to call in a crane and a flat bed trailer after one of their ladders got stuck.

    There was no actual fire, but the ladder automatically extended, got bent about 25 feet from the top and then wouldn't retract.

    It was sawed off and sent back to the manufacturer.
    You only have to be stupid once to be dead permanently
    IACOJ Power Company Liason
    When trouble arises and things look bad, there is always one individual who perceives a solution
    and is willing to take command. Very often, that individual is crazy. - Dave Barry.

  3. #3
    MembersZone Subscriber
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    48

    Default

    Wow, I feel sorry for the Lt. that had to call his Batt. Chief.

  4. #4
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Las Vegas,Nevada
    Posts
    1,012

    Question

    I'm just a little bit baffled by the automatically extended bit. Did anybody there figure out how or why before they sent it back?

  5. #5
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Woodbridge Twp, New Jersey
    Posts
    863

    Post

    Do you think that the Pierce Aerial Ladder from Boston, Mass is a med duty 250 # tip load ladder ?

  6. #6
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    8

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by oaattx934 View Post
    Wow, I feel sorry for the Lt. that had to call his Batt. Chief.
    There are no Battalions in the BFD, but that's just a minor detail. Still after looking @ another forum, Boston REALLY HATES Pierce, reasons being too many to list here, will list 1

    ex.

    Fire in North Boston, notorius for NARROW streets, Ladder 1 (early 2000s model AWS on it) sets up their outriggers. The outriggers clear not only the street, but the Sidewalk as well. The outriggers go all the way to the building fronts on BOTH sides.

    Mike

  7. #7
    Forum Member Chauffeur6's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Metro NY
    Posts
    613

    Default

    ...........
    Last edited by Chauffer6; 02-21-2007 at 07:44 PM. Reason: not even worth getting involved in the abortion this thread is gonna turn into!

  8. #8
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Woodbridge Twp, New Jersey
    Posts
    863

    Smile

    Quote Originally Posted by Chauffer6 View Post
    Do I "think"? No, I know it's a 105' Heavy Duty on a Dash chassis with a 500 lb tipload.

    How about we let this whole story play out before we start speculating? Yeah right, like THAT'LL happen.
    What type of rear mount aerials is the FDNY useing for the past 18 years ,Seagrave 250 # tip load ?The " CHICAGO " Fire Department has Pierce Med Duty 4 section 100' aerial ladders in service with ( 250 # ) tip loads !
    Last edited by NewJerseyFFII; 02-21-2007 at 07:56 PM.

  9. #9
    MembersZone Subscriber npfd801's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Somewhere in Illinois
    Posts
    2,219

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by NewJerseyFFII View Post
    Do you think that the Pierce Aerial Ladder from Boston, Mass is a med duty 250 # tip load ladder ?
    I'm pretty confident that the Boston 100 footers from Pierce are the medium duty aerials... However, it really doesn't matter what rating they are.

    I won't even begin to speculate as to what happened with the aerial in question.
    "Share your knowledge - it's a way to achieve immortality." - Stolen from Chase Sargent's Buddy to Boss program

  10. #10
    Some Guy
    Join Date
    Sep 1999
    Location
    I don't know but I here laughing.
    Posts
    1,000

    Default

    It probably had something to do with the sticker in the middle window. It could have ruined the integrity of the whole truck.
    This space for rent

  11. #11
    MembersZone Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Virginia
    Posts
    242

    Default

    I believe it is the medium duty aerial and I also believe that you can tell the difference by the number of outriggers. 4 outriggers for the heavy duty, 2 outriggers for the medium duty. The picture of the Boston Truck 15 doesn't seem to show any front outriggers - only rear - thus I would say it's a medium duty.

    I believe that Chicago uses a combination of medium and heavy duty aerials from Pierce. CFD seems to distinguish between the two by referring to the medium duty aerials as a "Truck Co." and the heavy duty arials as a "Aerial Tower Co."

    Again, I'm simply basing my comments on the number of outriggers and on some brief research on the Pierce website.

  12. #12
    MembersZone Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Posts
    466

    Default

    If this works, here is a photo from the Boston Herald
    Attached Images Attached Images  

  13. #13
    MembersZone Subscriber
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    48

    Default

    Is that aluminum? My guess looking at that pic is they set the ladder on the building which prevented the ladder trusses from carrying the load but thats kinda a strange hypothesis seeing as how boston has "the best laddermen" lol. No really though this is a sucky situation for everyone involved.

  14. #14
    Forum Member DeputyMarshal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Connecticut, USA
    Posts
    2,638

    Default

    One picture isn't much to base an opinion on but from that picture I wouldn't be surprised if it didn't turn out to be operator error rather than equipment failure.

    I'm sure we'll hear more about it as time goes on.
    "Nemo Plus Voluptatis Quam Nos Habant"

    The Code is more what you'd call "guidelines" than actual rules.

  15. #15
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    Dec 1999
    Location
    Swanton Fire Dept. Swanton, Vermont
    Posts
    476

    Default More info from EMTBravoNewEngland.com

    Found this on another site


    On Tuesday February 20 at approximately 2030hrs, Box 14-221 was transmitted for a reported fire at the South End Tennant Housing, 400 Massachusetts Ave. in the South End. Engines 22, 7 & 33 along with Ladder 15, Tower Ladder 17, Rescue 1, District 4 Chief & Division 1 Deputy Chief were assigned. While Ladder 15 was raising the aerial on their 2004 Pierce 105' Rearmount truck, the last fly section suffered a catastrophic failure & caved in upon itself, bending the stick significantly. A crang from Shaughnessey Crane was eventually dispatched to secure the stick so that it could be lowered to the bed. Two engineers from Pierce Fire Apparatus were dispatched from Appleton Wisconsin yesterday to Boston to investigate. Ladders 1, 7 & 18 were taken out-of-service until a complete and thorough inspection was completed. The Boston Herald had a great story & picture on page 2 of today's paper. http://news.bostonherald.com/localRe...ticleid=184327 More information when it becomes available.

  16. #16
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    43

    Default

    Judging by the width of the aerial sections in that picture, plus the "shiny" unpainted appearance, I would have to say that the failure was an E-One, not a Pierce. The medium duty Pierce aerials do not have as wide an aerial as depicted in the picture. So, if it is an E-One, then somebody needs to get their stories straight before starting something.

  17. #17
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    Dec 1999
    Location
    Swanton Fire Dept. Swanton, Vermont
    Posts
    476

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bgcjmc View Post
    Judging by the width of the aerial sections in that picture, plus the "shiny" unpainted appearance, I would have to say that the failure was an E-One, not a Pierce. The medium duty Pierce aerials do not have as wide an aerial as depicted in the picture. So, if it is an E-One, then somebody needs to get their stories straight before starting something.
    Read this article. http://news.bostonherald.com/localRe...ticleid=184327

    The Union and Pierce are at least acknowledging it happened. I don't think the Boston Herald has it that far off base with these comments.

  18. #18
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Hamlin, NY
    Posts
    54

    Default Pierce or E-One ?????

    To bgcjmc:

    What on earth was your point? This is clearly Ladder 15, which according to the photo earlier in this thread is in fact a Pierce. Add to that the fact that you can see rubber rung covers in the bent aerial photo, along with the white boxes at the tip, both of which are on the Pierce's and not on the E-Ones.

    I have to believe BFD knows what brand Ladder 15 is. So why would you post such an uninformed comment ? Why drag E-One into it when it clearly isn't even remotely involved ?

  19. #19
    MembersZone Subscriber
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    So of Can. / N. of Mexico
    Posts
    869

    Default Pierce Ladder Failure

    Keep Drinking The Kool Aid.

    Cary NC. Aerial Platform Failure
    Natick Ma. Rear Steer Ladder Steering System Failure
    Cary Platform Failure Again After it was Sold to Weston/Wausau Wisconson
    Boston Ladder Failure.

    I wonder what CSI investigators would conclude? A TREND?

  20. #20
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Bryn Athyn, Pa.
    Posts
    1,616

    Default

    I'm probably the last one who should be chiming in on this subject since I'm not a ladder person at all. But the instant I saw the picture, a memory flashback occurred.

    In the mid sixties, I was in a class at the the Fire Service Extension (now MFRI) of the University of Maryland. The speaker was Hubert Walker who was American LaFrance's ladder engineer. He was describing what kinds of things happens to ladders as a result of what gets done to them. That looks just like what he said (and showed) could happen from letting a ladder tip be supported by the building it's raised to.

    My recollection is that maybe it wouldn't happen right then and there, or maybe it would. But if the tension members of the truss were compromised from being supported at an earlier time, an incident could occur at a later time.

    Anyone with good ladder physics knowledge have anything to contribute?

    Stay safe out there, everyone goes home!

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Pierce Failure
    By ff43065 in forum Apparatus Innovation
    Replies: 25
    Last Post: 08-07-2005, 02:50 PM
  2. Electrifying Aerial Experience
    By STATION2 in forum Apparatus Innovation
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 02-11-2004, 09:43 PM
  3. Aerial rescue
    By resqtek in forum Firefighters Forum
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 01-14-2004, 09:31 PM
  4. Pierce Sky-FIVE aerial
    By mattqc99 in forum Apparatus Innovation
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 02-18-2003, 08:47 PM
  5. Pierce Sky-Five aerial ladder
    By CD in forum Apparatus Innovation
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 04-11-1999, 02:28 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts