+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 7 1234 ... Last

Thread: IAFF Muscle

  1. #1
    Forum Member
    MIKEYLIKESIT's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Division 24
    Posts
    4,360

    Default IAFF Muscle

    I thought I would start a new discussion outside of the Bronx fire thread. I did not attend the IAFF Alfred K. Whitehead Legislative Conference but have been folllowing along a bit this week. As some of you know there was a first-ever (at least for union) Presidential Forum. Many major candidates from both parties attended. I have no idea who the IAFF will end up supporting. I have no idea who I am going to vote for. Here comes my little rant. I am always amazed how quick our own membership is to vilify our International leadership. If you remember in 2004 the IAFF was THE only union to back Kerry. This was a time when all things left thought that Howard Dean was a messiah. There was absolutely no way the union was going to back Bush. But the oft-maligned leadership pullled a gutsy and savvy political manuever. The conspiracy theorists lamented the fact that Harold was positioning himself for a big Labor Dept. position....Like that would be somehow bad for union firefighters. We have all seen the caliber of some of those who were elevated to cushy government jobs once their buddy got in. You may or may not like Mr. Shaitberger, but you cannot deny he is a smart and effective union president. Harold has lead our union during some extremely tragic and trying times. There is no doubt that the murders of 9/11 have thrust the fire service into an uncomfortable spotlight. Our union stepped up during that awful time. Same as Katrina. The letter I read from a non-union Fire Chief in our magazine was quite gratifying. Real-life stuff. Not all this article 15 paid-volly stuff that gets blown way out of proportion by both sides but things like being able to distibute 500 USD to our members who desperately needed it in the early days after the disaster. I sometimes hear how the average firefighter "hates" Hillary Clinton. I think she is a good Senator, but I am not sure how she would be as president. The simple fact reamains that she fought very hard to fund the continuing health care for those who responded in 2001. She is a strong proponent of collective bargaining for all paid firefighters. This is bad for union firefighters? Two major locals endorsed President Bush in 2004. I strongly disagreed with those endorsements. I personally thought that they should have made NO endorsement if they were unhappy with the IAFF. Rant off. I think we should be proud that our union has really seemed to find a place at the table. There was coverage in many major news outlets. There was good participation by both Dems and Republicans. The IAFF has more muscle then any other fire service organization. If you look at the BIG picture, many of the initiatives that came from the IAFF have benefitted the fire service as a whole.
    IAFF-IACOJ PROUD

  2. #2
    Forum Member
    DeputyChiefGonzo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2000
    Location
    Somewhere between genius and insanity!
    Posts
    13,584

    Default

    The most important statement in Mikey's post...

    The IAFF has more muscle then any other fire service organization. If you look at the BIG picture, many of the initiatives that came from the IAFF have benefitted the fire service as a whole.
    Amen, Mikey, amen.
    ‎"The education of a firefighter and the continued education of a firefighter is what makes "real" firefighters. Continuous skill development is the core of progressive firefighting. We learn by doing and doing it again and again, both on the training ground and the fireground."
    Lt. Ray McCormack, FDNY

  3. #3
    Forum Member
    scfire86's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    HB
    Posts
    10,327

    Default

    The conspiracy theorists lamented the fact that Harold was positioning himself for a big Labor Dept. position....Like that would be somehow bad for union firefighters.
    I've read that several times during the 2004 campaign by those who had blind hatred for Kerry. And when asked why that would be bad there was always some babbling about a socialist agenda. Somehow Harold's being SecLabor was going to be the end of American democracy. One could only hope to have that amount of power as an appointee.

    I've watched some of the speeches on the IAFF's website. I was particulary disappointed in Obama. His speech talks about firefighters and then dissolves into his position on Iraq. Which isn't a firefighter issue. I was impressed by Hillary and Richardson. But will withold judgement until I've seen all of them. Remembering that Nov of '08 is 19 months away. I'd be willing to bet there are candidates who emerge that no one is talking about right now.

    As far as two locals supporting Bush. I was disappointed. And amused that all the conspiracy theorists who ranted about Harold had nothing to say about the NY brothers backing Bush. Given how they've been treated by the city it's safe to say they didn't make any deals, or any deals made were immediately ignored. And in my opinion that is a waste of an endorsement.
    Politics is like driving. To go forward select "D", to go backward select "R."

  4. #4
    Some Guy

    Join Date
    Sep 1999
    Location
    I don't know but I here laughing.
    Posts
    1,001

    Default

    He certainly gets paid enough.
    This space for rent

  5. #5
    Forum Member
    scfire86's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    HB
    Posts
    10,327

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by KyleWickman View Post
    He certainly gets paid enough.
    You think? Compared to leaders in similar private sector organizations his salary would be paltry be comparison.
    Politics is like driving. To go forward select "D", to go backward select "R."

  6. #6
    Forum Member
    ThNozzleman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Jefferson City, TN
    Posts
    4,339

    Default

    I'd be willing to bet there are candidates who emerge that no one is talking about right now.
    Man, I hope so. I like Obama and I hope he hangs in there. Hillary Clinton has ****ed me off with her initial support of the war and her refusal to admit she ****ed up. Whoever is elected will have to clean up the Bush/neocon mess in Iraq and return focus to domestic issues ASAP.
    I don't envy them in the least.

  7. #7
    Some Guy

    Join Date
    Sep 1999
    Location
    I don't know but I here laughing.
    Posts
    1,001

    Default

    He is one of the highest paid union leaders in the nation.
    This space for rent

  8. #8
    Forum Member
    scfire86's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    HB
    Posts
    10,327

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by KyleWickman View Post
    He is one of the highest paid union leaders in the nation.
    What's your point?
    Politics is like driving. To go forward select "D", to go backward select "R."

  9. #9
    the 4-1-4
    Jasper 45's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    ...A great place, on a Great Lake
    Posts
    2,784

    Default

    Two major locals endorsed President Bush in 2004. I strongly disagreed with those endorsements. I personally thought that they should have made NO endorsement if they were unhappy with the IAFF.
    Well, don’t forget that one local made that endorsement two elections in a row. You disagree with free speech, or the right to express yourself? My, how American, I mean union.
    I think that maybe the IAFF should have made NO endorsement, I strongly disagreed with the IAFF’s decision on who to endorse. Besides, after the past two elections, I have seen just how this “brotherhood” of union firefighters is. It’s all about the “brotherhood”, as long as everyone endorses the same candidate, or as long as everyone agrees with the IAFF.
    Give me a break.

  10. #10
    FossilMedic

    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    metro Washingon DC
    Posts
    526

    Default

    From Thursday's article
    Quote Originally Posted by Washington Post
    The International Association of Fire Fighters made a strong case yesterday for the title of the politicians' favorite labor union.

    Who else but the union that represents many of America's first responders -- the heroes of Sept. 11, 2001 -- can draw 11 declared or would-be presidential candidates, Republican and Democrat alike, to speak on the same day in Washington -- and along the way get into a public spat with former New York mayor Rudolph W. Giuliani, who was a no-show?
    http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...031402341.html

    One of the goals set by Schaitberger is federal legislation that provides "basic collective bargaining rights for every fire fighter in the nation." This would supercede the state right-to-work regulations that significantly cripple the ability of labor organizations to represent their members, resolve workplace problems and negotiate pay and work conditions. About 11 states have some type of right-to-work legislation.

    This will also help our brothers working in federal or military agencies, some still working a 66 hour work week at poverty wages.

    If you do not become a player at the national level of politics, how else could you accomplish this objective?

    Informational pickets, sit-ins or teach-ins? Nice way to generate press or create awareness, but not an effective way to establish enabling legislation at either the state or federal level.

    Strike? The strikes of the 1970-1980s represented a net loss in firefighter pay, benefits and working conditions.

    As a founding member of Local 2068, Schaitberger has personal experience dealing with the Virginia state legislature as they nullified the only labor contract the local had with Fairfax County thirty some years ago. Virginia does not recognize labor organizations.

    While teaching fire school throughout the commonwealth I would hear about punitive actions taken against firefighters who dared to establish an IAFF local.

    I appreciate the point about the International (or your local) endorsing candidates that you personally do not care for. The test is not whether the candidate is Republican, Independent or Democratic. The test is whether the candidate is friendly to issues important to the IAFF.

    Candidates cannot ignore an organization that provides funding and sweat equity to those that get IAFF endorsement. The last mid-term elections shows the power of a national labor organization that is skillful and focused on the democratic process.
    Last edited by MikeWard; 03-17-2007 at 07:20 AM.

  11. #11
    MembersZone Subscriber

    Join Date
    Jul 1999
    Location
    Flanders, NJ
    Posts
    13,537

    Default

    Here is an example of one potential landmine of having this guy in a DOL leadership role:

    Sen. Sam Brownback (R-Kan.) drew a polite but restrained reception. Sen. Chuck Hagel (R-Neb.), who announced Monday that he will announce later whether he plans to run for president, did worse. At one point, he praised volunteer firefighters -- to the dismay of those in the union audience.
    The State rests.

  12. #12
    Forum Member
    MIKEYLIKESIT's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Division 24
    Posts
    4,360

    Default Glass house ?

    Quote Originally Posted by jasper45 View Post
    Well, don’t forget that one local made that endorsement two elections in a row. You disagree with free speech, or the right to express yourself? My, how American, I mean union.
    I think that maybe the IAFF should have made NO endorsement, I strongly disagreed with the IAFF’s decision on who to endorse. Besides, after the past two elections, I have seen just how this “brotherhood” of union firefighters is. It’s all about the “brotherhood”, as long as everyone endorses the same candidate, or as long as everyone agrees with the IAFF.
    Give me a break.
    Kind of like my right to free speech and an opinion ?
    IAFF-IACOJ PROUD

  13. #13
    the 4-1-4
    Jasper 45's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    ...A great place, on a Great Lake
    Posts
    2,784

    Default

    Kind of like my right to free speech and an opinion ?
    I wasn’t the one telling a group of people to either step in line with the union, or to keep their mouths shut. My remark about the international’s endorsement was just an attention getter. I was fully happy with how everything went in the last election. The international didn’t represent my opinion with their endorsement, but my local did, and I was able to fully participate in that decision making process.
    The lack of tolerance by other ‘brothers’ was immediately evident in the e-mail and phone messages left with our office.
    Your glass house comment is way off base. If the international is going to make an endorsement for president, then there should be no dispute if a local decides another person is a better choice, and chooses to endorse someone else. You opened the door for criticism with this quote.
    Two major locals endorsed President Bush in 2004. I strongly disagreed with those endorsements. I personally thought that they should have made NO endorsement if they were unhappy with the IAFF.

  14. #14
    Forum Member
    MIKEYLIKESIT's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Division 24
    Posts
    4,360

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by GeorgeWendtCFI View Post
    Here is an example of one potential landmine of having this guy in a DOL leadership role:


    The State rests.
    I am slightly confused by this George. How many other labor unions would have 5 Republicans and 6 Democrats address their forum ? Pretty fair and balanced if you ask me.
    IAFF-IACOJ PROUD

  15. #15
    Forum Member
    MIKEYLIKESIT's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Division 24
    Posts
    4,360

    Default It would have been 6 Republicans...

    ...except for one notable exception.
    IAFF-IACOJ PROUD

  16. #16
    Forum Member
    scfire86's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    HB
    Posts
    10,327

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by GeorgeWendtCFI View Post
    Here is an example of one potential landmine of having this guy in a DOL leadership role:

    The State rests.
    And what's your point? The IAFF invited them to the forum. Clearly those two didn't know their audience and now the members present can tell their colleagues back home why those two won't be expecting IAFF support.

    I say well done for Harold.
    Politics is like driving. To go forward select "D", to go backward select "R."

  17. #17
    Forum Member

    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Boston
    Posts
    62

    Default

    Let me give you my persepective as a fireman with the City of Boston. Most of the guys that I know pretty much vote Republican, despite the anti-labor mentality. Why? Because overall they believe that the Republican's views on the world fit more in line with their values than the Democrats. Our Local might encourage members to vote for Kerry, Clinton or whomever but I doubt that the average guy is listening.

    Here's how I see the average Boston fireman (these are just a few examples):
    1) against affirmative action;
    2) believes that illegal immigrants are a major problem taxing all aspects of our society and should be dealt with accordingly;
    3) because of a mostly Catholic background maintains a conservative opinion on social issues;
    4) does not want to continue to pay more in taxes;
    5) a strong belief in the Second Amendment (including legal ownership of handguns); and
    6) is sick and tired of having their tax dollars go towards welfare recipients (how many of us have responded to incidents in housing projects only to see that the cars in the parking lots and televisions in the apartments are nicer than ours?).

    The Democratic Party is not the Party they used to be. Their priorities have shifted over the last 35 years as they've gone further to the left. It's leaves guys like me with a family, trying to do the right thing, shaking my head.

    PS: We endorsed Clinton in '92 and '96. How many of you small cities that were operating with one or two FF's per company saw your manning increase to 1 officer and 3 firefighters, minimum? Not too many, I'll bet.
    Last edited by BostonJake2340; 03-17-2007 at 01:01 PM.

  18. #18
    MembersZone Subscriber

    Join Date
    Jul 1999
    Location
    Flanders, NJ
    Posts
    13,537

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MIKEYLIKESIT View Post
    I am slightly confused by this George. How many other labor unions would have 5 Republicans and 6 Democrats address their forum ? Pretty fair and balanced if you ask me.
    It most certainly was. And, for whatever it is worth, I applaud the IAFF for that. It was definitely a benefit to their members.

  19. #19
    Some Guy

    Join Date
    Sep 1999
    Location
    I don't know but I here laughing.
    Posts
    1,001

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by scfire86 View Post
    What's your point?

    None really. I just don't care for the IAFF management. Kind of off the topic really, but the IAFF as labeled my union as a "rouge union." The NJFMBA has tried on many times to merge into the IAFF only to have been blocked many times. I find it ridiculous that we can not merge. Many locals here have dual membership. That's fine but why?
    This space for rent

  20. #20
    Some Guy

    Join Date
    Sep 1999
    Location
    I don't know but I here laughing.
    Posts
    1,001

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BostonJake2340 View Post
    Let me give you my persepective as a fireman with the City of Boston. Most of the guys that I know pretty much vote Republican, despite the anti-labor mentality. Why? Because overall they believe that the Republican's views on the world fit more in line with their values than the Democrats. Our Local might encourage members to vote for Kerry, Clinton or whomever but I doubt that the average guy is listening.

    Here's how I see the average Boston fireman (these are just a few examples):
    1) against affirmative action;
    2) believes that illegal immigrants are a major problem taxing all aspects of our society and should be dealt with accordingly;
    3) because of a mostly Catholic background maintains a conservative opinion on social issues;
    4) does not want to continue to pay more in taxes;
    5) a strong belief in the Second Amendment (including legal ownership of handguns); and
    6) is sick and tired of having their tax dollars go towards welfare recipients (how many of us have responded to incidents in housing projects only to see that the cars in the parking lots and televisions in the apartments are nicer than ours?).

    The Democratic Party is not the Party they used to be. Their priorities have shifted over the last 35 years as they've gone further to the left. It's leaves guys like me with a family, trying to do the right thing, shaking my head.

    PS: We endorsed Clinton in '92 and '96. How many of you small cities that were operating with one or two FF's per company saw your manning increase to 1 officer and 3 firefighters, minimum? Not too many, I'll bet.

    That pretty much sums it up around here too. Although I would say a bunch of us including myself would be more independent.
    This space for rent

  21. #21
    Forum Member

    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    126

    Wink Hello Mikey

    Quote Originally Posted by MIKEYLIKESIT View Post
    Kind of like my right to free speech and an opinion ?
    The IAFF always goes liberal Democrat. They even sent me a Video tape that I threw in the garbage, about how great Kerry the phony duck hunter was last time. Like somebody else said nobody pays much attention. Local 2 came out against Mayor Daley in the recent Election. Lets see how that works out for us since Daley won with 75%. /// Hey I told you I never liked putting my mouth on Resuscitator Annie. Yesterday there was a medical study out in the News that the Compressions is what is needed to keep up circulation. You can forget about the lip lock. All you EMT's are probably facing a lawsuit. What a World..

  22. #22
    Forum Member
    scfire86's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    HB
    Posts
    10,327

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BostonJake2340 View Post
    Let me give you my persepective as a fireman with the City of Boston. Most of the guys that I know pretty much vote Republican, despite the anti-labor mentality. Why? Because overall they believe that the Republican's views on the world fit more in line with their values than the Democrats. Our Local might encourage members to vote for Kerry, Clinton or whomever but I doubt that the average guy is listening.
    BJ. I applaud your comments. And that is exactly what you should be doing. The IAFF is tasked with supporting candidates who support firefighter issues. None of the issues you mention are firefighter issues. The IAFF can only recommend you vote for those endorsed. When you close the curtain and pull the lever the decision is all yours.

    I voted for Kerry and a significant amount of the rationale had nothing to do with his support from Harold or the IAFF.
    Politics is like driving. To go forward select "D", to go backward select "R."

  23. #23
    Forum Member
    MIKEYLIKESIT's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Division 24
    Posts
    4,360

    Default

    Rockie as we speak, our IAFF sanctioned state association (AFFI) is fighting tooth and nail against two liberal democratic state senators. (both from Chicago) They are trying to take local control away from our pension funds and require us to let the state invest our money. I for one am glad that I get calls from the AFFI political people asking us to do our part in contacting our local legislators. I am not a Local 2 member, but the Dorothy Brown endorsement made me scratch my head a little. The FOP and the other city unions made no endorsement. King Richie remembers things. I hope that the Brown endorsement dosent back fire too bad. However, in the city alderemanic race. labor was key in many races and it should be intersting to see how the city council will operate without a Daley super majority....Ha ha..I just made a funny.
    IAFF-IACOJ PROUD

  24. #24
    Forum Member
    MIKEYLIKESIT's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Division 24
    Posts
    4,360

    Default Why I support the union

    From the AFFI web page.


    Breaking News from Springfield, March 15, 2007

    Two Senate bills that would have a detrimental effect on professional firefighters and our pension funds passed Senate committees this week.

    Senate Bill 1166 was originally a “shell” bill, which means it was introduced, but had no substantive language in the bill. Amendment 1 to SB 1166 would have a very negative impact on local fire and police pension funds.

    The amendment states that in provisions concerning investments by downstate police pension funds and downstate firefighter pension funds, if a pension fund's investment in certain accounts or funds exceeds certain limitations or a pension fund fails to file an annual report with the Public Pension Division within 3 months after the due date of the annual report, then the Public Pension Division shall immediately notify the State Board of Investment established under Article 22A of the Pension Code, the Auditor General, and the General Assembly, whereupon, by operation of law, all authority and responsibility for managing the pension fund's assets shall immediately lie with the State Board of Investment, who shall have sole authority and responsibility for managing those assets until 3 consecutive annual reports filed with the Public Pension Division demonstrate that all investments and practices comply with the law.

    We are working with the Senate sponsors, and the leadership of the Senate to work towards addressing the issues that caused concerns for Senators. We are working diligently to defeat this legislation, and are asking for your assistance. Please write, call, or fax your State Senator and ask them to OPPOSE SB 1166 as amended, as this will have a very detrimental effect on your local pension fund.

    Senate Bill 1475 was originally a bill that would have changed the definition of Catastrophic Injury” under the Public Safety Employee Benefits Act. The sponsor of the bill, Senator Kimberly Lightford, has asked that all interested parties have discussions to express their concerns with this issue. While that request takes place, amendment 1 to SB 1475 was adopted in Senate Labor Committee, which would “shell” the bill, or strip out all the substantive language out of the original bill, in hopes that an agreement may take place. Please see the March 9, 2007 Legislative Update on the background to this bill.

    As always, please contact your AFFI Legislative Representatives by calling our office at 217-522-8180 with any questions or concerns you may have.

    Thanks for your time and attention on these important matters affecting professional, union firefighters of the AFFI.
    IAFF-IACOJ PROUD

  25. #25
    Forum Member
    BKDRAFT's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Bay Area, California
    Posts
    1,146

    Default

    I feel the same as BostonJake2340 does. I would like to vote for who the IAFF endorses but Democrats do not support my beliefs.

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 7 1234 ... Last

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Wanna lose Weight or Build Muscle
    By backdraft663 in forum The Off Duty Forums
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 06-16-2010, 02:00 AM
  2. Brother looking for some help
    By SME3756 in forum Career/Paid Firefighters Forum
    Replies: 228
    Last Post: 12-11-2006, 11:10 AM
  3. IAFF Boycott
    By seniorff in forum Meet and Greet
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 08-16-2002, 05:27 PM
  4. IAFF Boycott
    By seniorff in forum Fire Politics
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 08-16-2002, 12:11 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Log in

Click here to log in or register