Why register? ...To Enhance Your Experience
+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 75
  1. #1
    MembersZone Subscriber
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    North East
    Posts
    159

    Default Info on Pierce "PUC" ?

    Does anyone know anything about the Pierce "Puc" that is supposed to be released on April 19th?


  2. #2
    Let's talk fire trucks! BoxAlarm187's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Virginia
    Posts
    3,155

    Default

    Here are some of the guesses so far: "New Pierce?"

  3. #3
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Wisconsin
    Posts
    9

    Default

    It is something that will make you or look It is truly a great idea

  4. #4
    Forum Member Bones42's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Location
    Pt. Beach, NJ
    Posts
    10,570

    Default

    Piece u crap?
    "This thread is being closed as it is off-topic and not related to the fire industry." - Isn't that what the Off Duty forum was for?

  5. #5
    Forum Member Bones42's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Location
    Pt. Beach, NJ
    Posts
    10,570

    Default

    Push Up Costs. (also comes to mind)
    "This thread is being closed as it is off-topic and not related to the fire industry." - Isn't that what the Off Duty forum was for?

  6. #6
    Forum Member Engine305's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Sahuarita AZ, formerly of Hewitt NJ
    Posts
    293

    Exclamation Puc

    I kinda like the pump under cab. Who knows though. hmmmmmmm
    I cant have a Velocity or Impel cause they are too wide.so......
    The new rear mount pumper is working out very well though. Daytime Jaws call with 2 guys were done with extrication before the second due arrived on scene

  7. #7
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    Feb 1999
    Posts
    396

    Default

    Knowing firefighters, PUC will turn into PUKE real quick.
    I have only 2 allegiances, to my country and to my God. The rest of you are fair game.

  8. #8
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Woodbridge Twp, New Jersey
    Posts
    863

    Smile

    Quote Originally Posted by Bones42 View Post
    Piece u crap?
    Is your department not " HAPPY " with there new Pierce aerial ?

  9. #9
    Forum Member Engine305's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Sahuarita AZ, formerly of Hewitt NJ
    Posts
    293

    Default Puc

    Hows ur new truck coming NJFF?

  10. #10
    Forum Member Bones42's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Location
    Pt. Beach, NJ
    Posts
    10,570

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by NewJerseyFFII View Post
    Is your department not " HAPPY " with there new Pierce aerial ?
    We are very happy. Was just having some PUC lines come to mind.

    Polish Until Clean? (nah, don't like that one)

    Priced Under Competitors (that would be noteworthy)
    "This thread is being closed as it is off-topic and not related to the fire industry." - Isn't that what the Off Duty forum was for?

  11. #11
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Woodbridge Twp, New Jersey
    Posts
    863

    Post

    Quote Originally Posted by Engine305 View Post
    Hows ur new truck coming NJFF?
    The new Pierce custom cab rescue is not for our house, we have nine fire districts here in Woodbridge Township. Fire district # 8 will be getting the new rig,the order has been completed for the pre-payment of the chassis cab. Our fire house will have to wait a few years down the road for a new or refurbed tower ladder maybe on a new Pierce chassis " Arrow XT". The board of fire commissioners feel that there is plenty of life left in our Mack Aerialscope at this time.It was put in service in 1986 and is in very good condition, the only problem is the open cab jump seats and a under powered mack 285hp motor with a 5 speed man trans. The board likes to keep apparatus in service for 25 years before replacing them,and also the funding amount to be raised by " TAXATION " which is a dirty word here in New Jersey!...
    Last edited by NewJerseyFFII; 07-20-2007 at 10:42 AM.

  12. #12
    Forum Member Bones42's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Location
    Pt. Beach, NJ
    Posts
    10,570

    Default

    FD near me is fighting to replace their Sutphen. Getting the same thing from their town..."it still runs ok to us". Apparently, the FD has not been telling the town what condition the truck is truly in, until now when it needs to be funded.
    "This thread is being closed as it is off-topic and not related to the fire industry." - Isn't that what the Off Duty forum was for?

  13. #13
    MembersZone Subscriber
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    48

    Default

    Could it look something like this?








  14. #14
    MembersZone Subscriber
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Wisconsin
    Posts
    74

    Default

    Now aren't those interesting looking!!!! I've never seen anything like that.

    So.....if you're in a cold climate w/messy winters....don't you think everything would be covered in crap when you got to the scene if you were driving around in winter?

  15. #15
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    492

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by oaattx934 View Post
    Could it look something like this?







    Who makes these rigs? Very cool and interesting.

  16. #16
    MembersZone Subscriber npfd801's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Somewhere in Illinois
    Posts
    2,212

    Default

    I believe Westates did them and called them something like "intracab" pumpers.

    Most popular out west, if I recall correctly.

    The more I think about this pump under cab idea, I'm going to bet this isn't the new Pierce thing. I think the 2007 EPA emissions stuff (and the stuff coming for the next rounds of emission reductions) requires so much additional cooling that you wouldn't dare interfere with that on a cab over rig.

    Remember, the big reason you see the Impel and Velocity cabs is the cooling challenges Pierce couldn't overcome with the previous breed of chassis, with the exception of the Quantum and Arrow XT. I'm willing to bet the latest revision of the Quantum and the XT design had EPA requirements in mind when they were engineered.

    Just my speculation. I'll wandering around the show floor in Indy looking at everything just as much as everyone else is.
    Last edited by npfd801; 04-12-2007 at 09:55 PM.
    "Share your knowledge - it's a way to achieve immortality." - Stolen from Chase Sargent's Buddy to Boss program

  17. #17
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Potsdam NY
    Posts
    49

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Firefighter1244 View Post
    Now aren't those interesting looking!!!! I've never seen anything like that.

    So.....if you're in a cold climate w/messy winters....don't you think everything would be covered in crap when you got to the scene if you were driving around in winter?
    Deparments in my area use to put old turnout coats on their front mounts during the winter months. This would keep the cold wind and road slush off the pump somewhat. 500gpm front mounts with two 2-1/2" discharges, 500 gal tanks chevrolet chassis.

    Those were fun times.

  18. #18
    MembersZone Subscriber grains's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Salem, Oregon
    Posts
    59

    Default

    npfd801 hit it on the head.

    To my knowledge, none of the major manufacturers are producing front mount pumps such as this, and now with the '07 emission standards, I doubt it will ever be considered in the future.

    Of the departments that I have known that ran with front mount engines, all have replaced them with more conventional (side or top mount) configurations when it came time for new apparatus.

    Another disadvantage to this arrangement is when you are unfortunate enough to have a front end collision with something. The damage to the pump can be pretty expensive.
    What if the hokey pokey IS what it's all about?

    Apparatus Operator
    Salem Fire Department
    IAFF Local 314

  19. #19
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    9

    Default

    I can't believe those don't have serious overheating problems.

  20. #20
    MembersZone Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Virginia
    Posts
    242

    Default

    Could something like the apparatus shown in this thread with the front mounted pump under the cab be done and meet the EPA standards with a mid-mount or rear-mount engine?

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Pierce Aerial failure??????
    By UFDFF15 in forum Apparatus Innovation
    Replies: 196
    Last Post: 05-08-2007, 07:49 PM
  2. Pierce after FDNY???
    By Fire26 in forum Apparatus Innovation
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 08-24-2003, 06:42 PM
  3. Thermal Imaging Info
    By TIman in forum Thermal Imaging Cameras
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 06-25-2001, 02:48 PM
  4. APB ON A PIERCE MIDMOUNT
    By Chris309 in forum Firefighters Forum
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 06-13-2001, 10:08 AM
  5. Getting the info out on thermal imaging
    By TIMan in forum Thermal Imaging Cameras
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 11-30-2000, 09:35 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts