In our Driver / Operator Training program, we continue to cover Dual Pumping Operations. Two Engines working from a single Strong hydrant. I'm being led in the direction this is an out dated proceedure and should be deleted from the program. Any thoughts ?
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 20 of 72
-
05-06-2007, 03:43 PM #1Forum Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2007
- Posts
- 5
Dual Pumping Operations -outdated?
-
05-07-2007, 02:09 PM #2Forum Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2006
- Location
- North Carolina
- Posts
- 105
Nothing is outdated if it continues to be effective.
-
05-07-2007, 02:19 PM #3Forum Member
- Join Date
- Oct 2006
- Posts
- 775
-
05-07-2007, 02:49 PM #4
Dual pumping is more than hooking two engines to a single hydrant. Dual pumping is when you have an engine on a plug and then connect another engine up to the first, intake to intake. The second pumper receives residual water from the pump of the 1st one.
Having said that, no I have never done, seen it, or even heard of it being done outside of a training evolution. Its more of a nice to know than a need to know.Robert Kramer
cell #901-494-9437
Management is making sure things are done right. Leadership is doing the right thing. The fire service needs alot more leaders and a lot less managers.
"Everyone goes home" is the mantra for the pussification of the modern, American fire service.
Comments made are my own. They do not represent the official position or opinion of the Fire Department or the City for which I am employed. In fact, they are normally exactly the opposite.
-
05-07-2007, 02:56 PM #5MembersZone Subscriber
- Join Date
- May 2000
- Location
- SW MO
- Posts
- 4,244
I don't consider it outdated at all. Depending on the department, I can see several scenerios where dual pumping can be worked. We've had several situations at my career department where we should have dual pumped and didn't. Instead they made a long lay to a lesser hydrant.
Even in a rural situation, I could see it's benefit if you're relay pumping to an attack apparatus and could dual pump with another attack apparatus. In my mind, drivers need to know a number of things that they may use rarely, but need the information in case the day comes that they need that knowledge.
-
05-07-2007, 03:41 PM #6Forum Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2007
- Posts
- 5
Thanks for the replys
I agree. Its my intention to continue the training.
To be effective when it counts , the operator has be aware of the capabilities and limitations of the apparatus and water supply system. Its just one of the many task you may never be called to perform or it could be the one that really makes a difference.
-
05-07-2007, 04:25 PM #7
Is there a .1 percent chance of you using it? Then, you probably need to know how because we all know how murphy's law works.
We dont carry hard suction so we cant draft but we run mutual aid with a few departments who do carry hard suction and if the crap hits the fan... then I need to know how to draft because it HAS come up.
So, there is always a chance it could happen. In a wildland fire, anything can happen, no matter how outrageous
-
05-07-2007, 06:09 PM #8
-
05-07-2007, 06:46 PM #9
I agree, it should still be taught if you have the possibility of needing it one day.
Especially given the proliferation of 5" and 6" LDH for long lays of supply line. A single pumper in the 1050 to 1250 gpm range will not flow the capacity of that hose (or even close for that matter). Dual pumpers however, will allow you to flow much closer to the full capacity of that hose, over very long lays, when your source is adequate.
We don't all have the luxury of 1500-2000+ gpm engines, but that doesn't mean we can't get 3 or 4 of the smaller ones through mutual aid. Two pumpers on the hydrant or draft can easily supply two or more pumpers on the scene through one large supply line.Never argue with an Idiot. They drag you down to their level, and then beat you with experience!
IACOJ
-
05-07-2007, 07:50 PM #10
Out here it's called relay pumping. It's very effective if you have multiple engine and ladder truck operations at the recieving end. 5" hose can only carry so much water...
IAFF
-
05-07-2007, 08:08 PM #11Forum Member
- Join Date
- Feb 2004
- Location
- California
- Posts
- 584
Or if you have hills, you might have a good hydrant with 100 psi but a 200 foot rise will result in no water at the pump even assuming frictionless hose. Good place to park a pumper at the hydrant and one at the structure. Wouldn't take that much of a hill if you had a long lay.
Assuming you actually mean an engine at the hydrant and one at the fire. Not really sure why you would ever park two pumpers at 1 hydrant unless it was the only one in town. Ah, just re-read Mcalwells reply, I guess if you had a really good hydrant that might be within reason.Last edited by NonSurfinCaFF; 05-07-2007 at 08:12 PM.
-
05-07-2007, 08:12 PM #12
actually dual pumping and relay pumping are seperate things. dual pumping is per ifsta is using a strong hydrant to supply two pumpers intake to intake. the second pumper recieves excess water supply from the first pumper.
Relay pumping per ifsta is using two or more pumpers to move water over a long distance by operating them in series. Water discharged from one pumper flows through the hoses to the inlet of the next pumper and so on.FOOLS
RFB-KTF-DTRT
-
05-07-2007, 08:43 PM #13
It's not a hard thing to do.
Place an engine on the plug. Move water.
Ready the second piece- connect a hard sleeve to the second piece, then maneuver it in place adjacent to the first piece which is on the hydrant already moving the water. Leave just enough slack in the hard sleeve to be able to move it onto the steamer of the first piece.
Now gate down the hydrant until you have just a little over zero left on the intake gauge of the first piece. NEVER go to or below zero! When you are there, take off the opposite side steamer cap on the first piece, and put the hard sleeve on (which is already connected to the second piece). When you have it all secure, open the plug back up, and voila! Now flow water with the second piece.
Takes practice, and the 2 drivers need to communicate, but it's really not as hard as folks think!Last edited by FWDbuff; 05-07-2007 at 10:53 PM.
"Loyalty Above all Else. Except Honor."
-
05-07-2007, 10:40 PM #14Banned
- Join Date
- Feb 2007
- Location
- In my house
- Posts
- 2,332
Relay pumping is where you have a more than one pumper connected in series. From what I ma reading here dual pumping occurs when two (and I guess you could use more) pumpers are connected at the same hydrant pumping in parallel. Never heard of it and we never use it. Our pumpers are 1500 GPM units. Most of the hydrants we have couldn't supply enough water to run one pumper, hooking up 2 would be a waste. Then again, we rarely use hydrants anyway. That is the problem with these schools, They will teach you stuff that you will never use, or you might use 10 years from now. And 10 years from now you will have forgotten all about it.
Certifications and credentials are nice, but unless there is a recertification process it really doesn't mean much. Everyone wants to think that if you have been through and passed FF1 and FF2 that you can instantly go anywhere in the country and do the job. I guess the actual training needs to be geared more towards the local area and how things work in that area.
-
05-07-2007, 10:47 PM #15
FOOLS
RFB-KTF-DTRT
-
05-07-2007, 11:05 PM #16Forum Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2006
- Posts
- 11
I have Just completed my 1002's, and tandem(duel) pumping is still taught. Although new advances have changed it a bit. Assuming you have inlet gates on your steamer ports, instead of using hard suction and gating back your hydrant to try to make the connection, put a short pony lenght of 5 inch high vol from inlet gate to inlet gate and open things up. Not as many risks as trying to gate back your hydrant any only minimally more friction loss than with the hard suction.
-
05-08-2007, 04:09 AM #17Banned
- Join Date
- Feb 2007
- Location
- In my house
- Posts
- 2,332
We tend to train and get proficient in the things we actually do and need. Something that may be of use once in 50 years is of no use to us and a waste of valuable time. We have no high rises, so there is no need to even train on them.
We are a volunteer organization and we seem t osee a large turn over of people. It's more about the politics than anything else. Too many guys don't get their way or things don't go the way they would like and the quit. I also think some get burned out. We train on things like relay pumping, setting up a water source, and using hydrants. Yes we do hydrants even though we only have them in about 5% of the district. And usually, what happens is the group as a whole is so used to setting up a portable pond and water shuttle that we rarely use the hydrants.
I'm pretty much sure there were a whole bunch of things that were taught in the course that evetnually got filed away as useless information. Some of it was that the ladder company comes in and they do the search and rescue. They are followed by the engine company that does the attack. And they are followed by something else. We don't have ladder companies or engine companies or any of that stuff. It was garbage you had to learn and then threw it away as useless knowledge.
Sorry but that is the reality of the situation.
-
05-08-2007, 06:09 AM #18MembersZone Subscriber
- Join Date
- Jan 2007
- Location
- St. Louis City Mo
- Posts
- 382
Does anyone have a picture of this?
-
05-08-2007, 08:33 AM #19
We don't have these "hydrant" things you speak of around here. We have to go out of town to play with those. So I have to ask the million dollar question here.
WHY?
Wouldn't it be more effective to just run two supply lines off the hydrant, one for each truck?Even the burger-flippers at McDonald's probably have some McWackers.
-
05-08-2007, 09:37 AM #20Forum Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2004
- Posts
- 259
We use dual pumping here on a regular basis. Dual pumping is NOT relay pumping and it requires no hard suction hose anywhere in the evolution. It is very simple to do and only requires 2 engines and 1 good hydrant...or 1 okay hydrant and 2 engines flowing less than capacity each.
Here is one common example of how we use it...keep in mind we are in a metro-urban area with a good water system:
Engine 1 stops in front of house on fire, catches their own plug, and pulls off 2 preconnects to attack the fire.
Engine 2 pulls up...they did NOT catch a plug, they pull a couple of their own preconnects off but do NOT have an easily accessible plug. Engine 1 isn't using all the water that is available from their hydrant.
Engine 2 can hook a short sleeve of 5" (not hard suction) from their intake to Engine 1's unused intake. The reason it has to be on the intake and not the discharge of E-1 is simple...Engine 2 does not want any additional pressure from Engine 1...(remember, E-1 is pumping attack lines, we don't want 150 psi pushing water to E-2 through 15' of 5" hose) If we attached to E-1's discharge we would get all the pump pressure (unless we gated down)...but why gate down since you can attach to the intake and avoid the risk of water hammer altogether.
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Similar Threads
-
Did you respond to WTC???
By E40FDNYL35 in forum Firefighters ForumReplies: 197Last Post: 04-21-2011, 07:28 PM -
Dual Pumping Operations -outdated?
By training6604 in forum The EngineerReplies: 5Last Post: 06-14-2007, 06:45 AM -
Dual Dumptank Operations?
By KEEPBACK200FEET in forum Fireground TacticsReplies: 41Last Post: 08-18-2006, 01:05 PM -
Round 4 - Status / News
By HazMan in forum Federal FIRE ACT Grants & FundingReplies: 76Last Post: 08-31-2002, 03:45 PM -
RFP's
By D Littrell in forum Apparatus InnovationReplies: 1Last Post: 09-08-2000, 06:36 PM

LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks




