This guy Gary Lacey is always writing editorial columns bashing firefighters. He never has a nice word to say and I am sick of him. Check this article out http://www.dailybulletin.com/opinions/ci_5834008 if this link doesn't work go to http://www.dailybulletin.com
then opinions and look for the article:
"Firefighters appreciated, unbelievably well paid."
I wish the papers would stop printing garbage.
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 20 of 33
05-07-2007, 04:01 PM #1
- Join Date
- May 2007
Why does this guy seem Hate firefighters?
05-07-2007, 06:11 PM #2
Those that can't do...criticize.
For every mutt, there are 99 other people who appreciate their firefighters.
Don't worry about him.. he isn't worth the aggravation!"The education of a firefighter and the continued education of a firefighter is what makes "real" firefighters. Continuous skill development is the core of progressive firefighting. We learn by doing and doing it again and again, both on the training ground and the fireground."
Lt. Ray McCormack, FDNY
05-07-2007, 06:17 PM #3
- Join Date
- Sep 1999
- I don't know but I here laughing.
He writes stuff like this to bank on people emotions. He tries to create controversy. He also wants to get his name out there. Most people donít even pay attention. People like him are a dime a dozen. Just remember he WANTS you to get mad. He WANTS you to flood the paper (website) with letters of protest. Donít give him the time of day, but keep a good memory.This space for rent
05-07-2007, 06:22 PM #4
I always get a chuckle out of folks like this. They know all about being a firefighter without ever having ridden on a fire apparatus.
While I admit I'm not helping. This thread is already too long.Politics is like driving. To go forward select "D", to go backward select "R."
05-07-2007, 06:35 PM #5
Yeah...and he better hope that HIS house doesn't ever catch on fire....can we say "Open mouth, insert foot"??? What a dumbarse..."Well behaved women rarely make history"
05-08-2007, 01:16 AM #6
- Join Date
- Jan 2005
Yep, too long already.
I hereby change the topic to:
Tax on Newspapers?
I went to the store today and gave the clerk the usual two quarters for my local paper, and she tells me the total is 54 cents. Great, now I have to break a dollar.
I laughed it off with an "I'll be damned. It's the Stamp Act all over again."
Freedom of the Press (plus 7%)."Yeah, but as I've always said, this country has A.D.D." - Denis Leary
05-08-2007, 02:41 AM #7
05-08-2007, 11:34 PM #8
- Join Date
- May 2001
- Recently relocated to Baltimore County, MD
We used to call papers like that "fish wrap" because that is all they were good for. Well maybe you could line your dogs kennel with itTom
Never Forget 9-11-2001
Stay safe out there!
05-09-2007, 02:26 AM #9
On note I have to address here. Every time I hear that "Firefighters jobs are not in the BOL top 15 dangerous jobs..." I want to f-ing punch someone.
The stats. and numbers come from insurance companies final year end tallys. BUT MOST PAID FIRE DEPARTMENTS ARE SELF INSURED. So our #s dont get transmited to the final reports. And the Volunteer Firefighters are covered by a private insurance company and its up to that particular comp. to forward their #s as well.
I hate people like Mr. Lacy that will twist a certain subject to fit blurred view.
05-09-2007, 02:39 AM #10
I personally think that the numbers, however they are done, would be tainted. You take some of the larger departments out there who fight fire all the friggin time and have a high injury rate.... and then you compare them with thousands of suburban departments and vollies.... who i'm not saying dont fight fire and dont get hurt, but do it on a much rarer scale and it taints the numbers.
Everyone is out to get hurt and be injured. But, you take the fire and injury rate of a large urban department and compare to a city that runs maybe 10% of the fires... I hope you get my idea.
Now, you compare it to a lumberjack.... who if its in Canada or Oregon or Montana.... your cutting trees down. Same thing no matter where you go. Your not dealing with economic situations, building construction, crazed drivers.
You have a tree.... and a chainsaw.... you combine the two and tree fall down... and then you move on. How would it be different if it was in Oregon or BFE Canada... other than the obvious fact that American Tree's are worth more
05-09-2007, 03:10 AM #11
Giving loggers their due. They and crabbers have dangerous jobs. No doubt about it. But how many of them go to work thinking they will run towards a situation everyone is running from? Fire, Haz-Mat, building collapse, et al.
That is where the comparison falls apart. When they do have something (except crabbers) happen that exceeds their ability to respond they call us.Politics is like driving. To go forward select "D", to go backward select "R."
05-09-2007, 03:11 AM #12
05-09-2007, 10:03 AM #13
- Join Date
- Oct 2006
The Bureau of Labor Statistics creates this annual report based on a document called the Census of Fatal Occupational Injuries (CFOI). One of the data sources used in the creation of this document is the records of worker's comp insurers. But that is not the only, or even chief, data source. The CFOI also looks at death certificates and reports to federal and state agencies for example. And even departments that self insure have to report deaths, injuries, and occupational diseases. And dead firefighters have death certificates just like everyone else.
Injuries and illnesses are a little more difficult to track and account for. The tool the BLS uses is the Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses (SOII). As the name suggests, this is a survey. Specifically, it is a random sample of 250,000 workplaces each year. While the statistical basis for this survey is sound, it is still a survey, and not a report of ALL illnesses and injuries.
Do I mean to suggest that the news stories are correct in not placing firefighting in the list of most dangerous jobs? No, not exactly. Those stories generally refer to the annual BLS report. And that report is ONLY about fatalities, not long-term chronic illness.
You can fact-check this yourself. We are very aware of the number of LODDs, right? Well, in 2005, the death rate per 100,000 loggers was 92. And we know that the firefighting LODD rate was not (thank God) close to that.
None of this is to suggest that Lacy isn't a tool.
05-09-2007, 12:10 PM #14
My question is then- Why are the "Most Dangerous Jobs" always private industry? And why do the reports always come out after the new calendar years when the tallys are made?
05-09-2007, 01:42 PM #15
- Join Date
- Oct 2006
And why do the reports always come out after the new calendar years when the tallys are made?
Last edited by randsc; 05-09-2007 at 01:48 PM.
05-09-2007, 02:49 PM #16
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
If the death is from a Vollie then the death certificate is not necessarily correct. True it will list the manner of death but in the little known section on the death certificate or workers compensation form for the occupation of the deceased it is not listed as firefighter for volunteers. Since volunteers have other jobs and carreers that is their actual occupation then that is what is listed. Mine for instance would be IT Analyst. It would be an odd listing to see someone who works in IT on the BOL list.
What should prevail in these matters is peoples common sense, which there is a severe lack of in our country. I was in graduate school when I met a girl who was 23 years old and never had even met a fireman before. The important thing is that no matter what a report says or a so called journalist says we know, our families know and our friends know the dangers of firefighting and we should always stay aware and never become complacent in our duties.
05-09-2007, 03:34 PM #17
05-09-2007, 06:40 PM #18
I wasnt insulting lumberjacks because i know their job is dangerous. But, what I was refering to... was that their job is relatively the same thing... day after day. You cut down trees.
Same with crab fisherman. You watch dangerous catch and see what they go through. Its a VERY Dangerous job.
But, how can running into burning buildings, collapsed buildings, haz-mat situations not be anymore dangerous than that?
Same with cops. Shoot-outs and such.
The only problem is that, there are a lot of towns where that just doesnt happen. But, a LAPD Cop and a Houston Cop and a NY Cop... they face a lot more danger than smalltown, Oklahoma. Same with FDNY, LAFD, HFD... they face a lot more danger than small town backdoor FD.
Yet, they are all lumped in together.
05-10-2007, 12:38 AM #19We citizens/bosses do appreciate the service our Rancho Cucamonga firefighters render, but their job is no more important than our other public servants' service in our city.
Yup, I LOVE that one.
Any Twinkie can throw garbage in a truck, or scratch out a ticket (meter maids), not our Brothers in Blue
It takes little training to work in DPW, or facilities maintinence, but it takes over a year of training for us just to have an inkling of a clue about the vast information that is out there for us.AJ, MICP, FireMedic
This message has been made longer, in part from a grant from the You Are a Freaking Moron Foundation.
05-10-2007, 01:55 AM #20
Comparing firefighting to crab fishing (or lumberjacking) is not a fair comparison. After all, it's comparing protecting lives and property to fishing. Apples to oranges.
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
By E40FDNYL35 in forum Firefighters ForumReplies: 197Last Post: 04-21-2011, 08:28 PM
By StLRes2cue in forum Testing & FitnessReplies: 5Last Post: 06-27-2005, 12:04 PM
By Roofhook in forum Firefighters ForumReplies: 1Last Post: 01-06-2005, 02:42 PM
By LifeguardEMT726 in forum Firefighters ForumReplies: 13Last Post: 11-11-2003, 02:43 AM
By NJFFSA16 in forum Firefighters ForumReplies: 33Last Post: 09-24-2002, 11:50 PM