OK, heres my plan. Present something to the powers that be to make a change to smoothbores, if nothing else, for our highrise packs. Our district is a mx of mostly 1 story SFDs, a few duplexes, highrise condos, and commercial buildings.
They argue that the lower PSI will lead to kinks.
They argue that steam conversion puts the fires out.
They are stubborn. Where can I find data to back my claim that smoothbores are safer, and that GPM puts fires out, NOT steam conversion.
If you are pro fog, great. I don't care that much. Fog has a place, as does smoothbores. I would like to see the Elkhart brass combo nozzles being bought. They give you the best of both worlds.
Help is appreciated in advance!
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 20 of 45
Thread: Movement for smoothbores
-
06-22-2007, 02:46 AM #1
Movement for smoothbores
AJ, MICP, FireMedic
Member, IACOJ.
FTM-PTB-EGH-DTRT-RFB-KTF
This message has been made longer, in part from a grant from the You Are a Freaking Moron Foundation.
-
06-22-2007, 03:18 AM #2
If you want to present something to management on this then you need to have a good base knowledge of GPM versus Fire Load .... you need to flow-test your own lines under routinely operating scenarios .... you may not be getting 150gpm (or whatever) as believed.
- Understand that fog nozzles serve several purposes other than direct suppression
- In high-rise situations I agree that smooth-bores can outperform fog patterns in some situations
Try http://www.fire-flows.com for information on firefighting flow-rates versus fire loads etc.
Quite simply, your NFA flow-formula is the most reliable method you have (my opinion) for assessing practical firefighting needs.
-
06-22-2007, 02:10 PM #3
Paul, that would be me reasoning for wanting the Elkhart Brass nozzles. I got to see them, and play with them when I was an explorer. They look just like a regular fog nozzle, but the fog part screws off, leaving you with a smoothbore underneath. The idea being, take the tip off, pocket it, knock the fire down with smoothbore, then mop up/ hydrolically vent with fog.
There are many fires that a smoothbore wouldnt be as ideal for, brush fires, rubbish fires, and since that is a good deal of our fires, we would need to keep the fog tips.
As for the high rise kits, would two 1 3/4 lines, or one 2.5 line work better?AJ, MICP, FireMedic
Member, IACOJ.
FTM-PTB-EGH-DTRT-RFB-KTF
This message has been made longer, in part from a grant from the You Are a Freaking Moron Foundation.
-
06-22-2007, 03:17 PM #4Forum Member
- Join Date
- May 2005
- Posts
- 275
BLS: Breakaways are the way to go, have 150 gpm fogs with 1" solid bores on the breakaways. This way if you get an officer who is a moron and loves fogs you can kinda drop it off at the door.
As for 2 lines verses one, ya gotta consider manpower-flow needed, etc. Our Hi-rise packs have a gated 2-1/2" so its up to whoever is calling the shots whether we run one large line or 2 smaller.
Last edited by wag11c; 06-22-2007 at 03:19 PM.
-
06-22-2007, 03:51 PM #5
We currently have one section of 2.5, a gated wye, then 2 150 ft sections of 1/3/4 with fog nozzles. Our manpower during that weekdays is 4-5 initial alarm, then with a working fire page, maybe another 4 or 5 more. With mutual aid, it would increase significatly, but for a quick knockdown, I am inclined to go with one 2.5 in line.
AJ, MICP, FireMedic
Member, IACOJ.
FTM-PTB-EGH-DTRT-RFB-KTF
This message has been made longer, in part from a grant from the You Are a Freaking Moron Foundation.
-
06-22-2007, 04:27 PM #6
Even with a 2 1/2 you definately need to think about a backup line. When windows blow out in a highrise you can end up with a blow torch in your face from the wind at the upper floors. Open or broken balcony doors, a huge opening to fan a firestorm. A few years back I had the second line into a 15th floor fire. The apartment went in 4-5ft then slpit left and right with fire in both directions in all rooms. We went opposite the first line and took care of our side. If there was only one line and they started to make a push, there would have been a few rooms of fire behind them. There was zero visibility so the guys on the first line didn't know about the fire behind them. How about a broken length?
-
06-22-2007, 05:00 PM #7
-
06-22-2007, 07:48 PM #8Forum Member
- Join Date
- Feb 2007
- Posts
- 66
-
06-22-2007, 07:51 PM #9
-
06-22-2007, 08:00 PM #10
Akron makes a Sabor Jet Nozzle, Smooth bore up the middle and a fog around the outside. The bail controls the smoothebore and you turn the tip like adjusting the fog pattern to control the fog pattern.(turn on off). We got them for CAFS use since you should be using smooth bores for cafs... Im not saying I love them because they take some getting use to but they do work....It does give you the advantage of both in one....
Be SAFE!!! Go home when your shift is done and enjoy life.
This is MY OPINION and ONLY MINE.
Not my Departments/IAFF/WPFF
-
06-22-2007, 08:11 PM #11Forum Member
- Join Date
- Jul 1999
- Location
- Rural Wisconsin, work in the burbs of Milwaukee
- Posts
- 8,110
The Elkhart Nozzles are the 4000 series Chief Nozzles. They are available in 100, 75 and 50 psi versions. The slug tip pistol grip shut off is the B275-GAT. How do I know? Both my volly and career FD use them.
My volly FD uses a 200 gpm at 75 psi combo tip backed with a 1 1/4 inch slug on 2 inch hose.
My career FD uses a 200 gpm at 75 psi combo tip with a 15/16 slug tip on 1 3/4 inch hose.
This is a great set up giving you the best of both worlds.
FyredUp
-
06-22-2007, 08:13 PM #12
Most commonly they are the Elkhart Chief combo nozzle 4000 series and the B-275GAT pistol grip shut off with the built in slug tip.
From fyredup
there ya go.AJ, MICP, FireMedic
Member, IACOJ.
FTM-PTB-EGH-DTRT-RFB-KTF
This message has been made longer, in part from a grant from the You Are a Freaking Moron Foundation.
-
06-22-2007, 08:14 PM #13
Now I look silly!
I just found your post from about a year ago, when I had asked the same questionAJ, MICP, FireMedic
Member, IACOJ.
FTM-PTB-EGH-DTRT-RFB-KTF
This message has been made longer, in part from a grant from the You Are a Freaking Moron Foundation.
-
06-22-2007, 08:20 PM #14MembersZone Subscriber
- Join Date
- Apr 2003
- Location
- Fort Lauderdale, FL
- Posts
- 45
One thing to think about when considering your high-rise pack setups is what type of pressure you are going to get at the connection. The editions of NFPA 14 (the standard for standpipes) prior to 1994 required only 65 psi to be available at the most remote discharge, usually the one on the roof. Newer editions (after 1994) require 100 psi at the discharge of the most remote standpipe. Also, NFPA 14 recommends using 2-1/2" hose lines with smoothbore nozzles, and all requirements for fire flows use those two types of equipment as the assumed equipment to be used with the system.
This is extremely important because using a 150' standpipe pack, you have to factor in the friction loss of your hose line. For 2-1/2" hose lines, it is approximately 5 psi per length of hose (depending on brand). Therefore, you will still have 50 psi of nozzle pressure in older standpipe systems. However, should you chose to use 1-3/4" hoselines on your standpipes, you will be getting a higher level of friction loss. This means you will have less than 50 psi at the nozzle, which with both automatic & smoothbore nozzles equals to a reduced fire flow. Also, it is important to remember that fog nozzles are much more prone to clogging due to sedimentation and debris that can be found in standpipe systems. Smoothbore nozzles will allow something as large as a small rodent to pass through the nozzle without clogging the hoseline.
A lot of people are scared to use the 2-1/2" lines, but the key is to train with it. Training and proper techniques makes it a very manageable tool, and for high-rise fires should be the first line in service, in my opinion.
-
06-22-2007, 08:22 PM #15Forum Member
- Join Date
- Jul 1999
- Location
- Rural Wisconsin, work in the burbs of Milwaukee
- Posts
- 8,110
Nice one BLSBoy, I will admit to laughing outloud.
FyredUp
-
06-22-2007, 09:04 PM #16MembersZone Subscriber
- Join Date
- Nov 1999
- Location
- Connecticut
- Posts
- 1,017
FTLAUD;
That is one of the most concise and clear explanations of why to use 2 1/2" and smooth bore on high-rise packs I have ever read.-------------------
"The most mediocre man or woman can suddenly seem dynamic, forceful, and decisive if he or she is mean enough." from "Crazy Bosses"
-----------------------------------------------
Genius has its limits, but stupidity is boundless.
-
06-23-2007, 12:29 AM #17Forum Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2000
- Location
- MadisonTwpFD-Newark,Ohio
- Posts
- 22
BLSBoy, I would look up the NIOSH Fatality Reports for several of the high-rise fires. I recall two or three that were directly related to low flow pressures on the standpipe. It is difficult to argue with a NIOSH report.
If nobody beats me to it I will look them up tomorrow and post here.Anything less than excellent is unacceptable!
-
06-23-2007, 01:03 AM #18MembersZone Subscriber
- Join Date
- Apr 2003
- Location
- Fort Lauderdale, FL
- Posts
- 45
Thanks for the compliment KenNFD1219
Here's one USFA report, on the Meridian Plaza fire in Philly where low pressures being used with fog nozzles and 1-3/4" hoselines lead to an 18+ hour fire that consumed 8 floors of a high rise. One of the first fires that comees to mind in terms of low pressures coming off of a standpipe system.
http://www.interfire.org/res_file/pdf/Tr-049.pdf
-
06-23-2007, 04:04 AM #19
Checking in right quick, then off the bed.
Ft. Laud....Wow. You WILL be hearing from me in the near future. I am going to be picking you brain alot. MUCH thanks for all the info and the explainations.
Fyredup - do you have any literature on the nozzles, and or pricing on them?
and PS Fyred......its known as "LOL", or Laughing Out Loud
AJ, MICP, FireMedic
Member, IACOJ.
FTM-PTB-EGH-DTRT-RFB-KTF
This message has been made longer, in part from a grant from the You Are a Freaking Moron Foundation.
-
06-23-2007, 04:55 AM #20
Just to make note that 2 1/2" lines may/will be manpower reliant as opposed to 2" hose-lines. Staffing the 2 1/2" line requires at least one additional firefighter over the 2" and at stand-pipe pressures and flows, friction losses in the 2" (compared to the 1 3/4") are not so critical.
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Similar Threads
-
Professor Who Called Wtc Victims Nazis To Speak
By CaptOldTimer in forum Firefighters ForumReplies: 18Last Post: 02-14-2005, 10:05 AM -
Movement of the Structure!!!
By billy in forum Specialized RescueReplies: 4Last Post: 07-31-2000, 11:07 PM -
Forest Fire Fighters Reform Movement
By hoffa in forum Wildland FirefightingReplies: 0Last Post: 04-13-2000, 01:10 AM

LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks




