Why register? ...To Enhance Your Experience
+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 32

Thread: Top Mount Pumps

  1. #1
    Forum Member axemanst3's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    eastern shore of md
    Posts
    211

    Question Top Mount Pumps

    Ok seemed like this was a good topic and I don't think it's on here yet.

    Top mount pumps is the subject. Like them, hate them, could care less... want to know your opinions. Looking for a new rescue/pumper trying to decide what we want.

    Our first run engine is a pierce sabre which is a top mount. First, from an operator standpoint, I love the top mount. Visibility and safety I think are the key when talking about the top mounts. Also when first starting to drive at least from what I remember... I thought the top mount was a little less intimidating to use, it kinda lays everything out in front of you. I have no problem with the side mounts, but I think the transition from our old engine to our new one would be smoother if it had the same style pump.

    Ok now from the whacker standpoint LOL! Side mounts look cooler and they allow you more room to place the stuff that you need for rescue opps.


    Is visibility important enough to sacrifice space?


  2. #2
    MembersZone Subscriber Dickey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2000
    Location
    Wisconsin
    Posts
    5,111

    Default

    We have had top mount, enclosed pump panel trucks for years. In fact, we have the first top mount, enclosed pump truck Darley ever made. Just because we are so close to them and at the time, our Assistant Chief was a salesman for Darley.

    We love them. Greater visability and safety is the main reason. Plus it is a little more simple to run the pump too. Everything on the left side runs the left side of the truck, everything on the right, runs the right side. It also keeps your operator off of the ground and out of traffic. Enclosed cabs are quieter too, less interruptions by people walking up. Enclosed cabs are more expensive, take up more space but then you have a rehab area as well. You don't have to sacrifice storage space for an enclosed cab, but it just makes your truck a bit longer.

    All a matter of personal preference. After using top mounts, I would hate to go back to side mounts.
    Jason Knecht
    Assistant Chief
    Altoona Fire Dept.
    Altoona, WI

    IACOJ - Director of Cheese and Whine
    http://www.cheddarvision.tv/
    EAT CHEESE OR DIE!!

  3. #3
    Forum Member axemanst3's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    eastern shore of md
    Posts
    211

    Default

    we are actually looking at a darley now. have you seen the new top mount panel for their auto CAFS? It is layed out really nice

  4. #4
    MembersZone Subscriber Dickey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2000
    Location
    Wisconsin
    Posts
    5,111

    Default

    I have seen it and it looks pretty simple however I'm not a big fan of a total digital/electronic pump panel. If there was a problem with the electrical system, you are screwed. had that happen a couple times before with one of our trucks and it kept on pumping just fine. Could be I'm just too old school but I would prefer to have a manual pump panel as much as possible. Maybe that is going against the trends these days and I just gotta deal with changing times too, who knows.

    When you deal with Darley on the CAFS, ask for Troy. He is the expert on foam and will not pressure you either way like a salesman would. he answer anything you want to know about anything and won't lead you astray.
    Plus I went to high school with him
    Jason Knecht
    Assistant Chief
    Altoona Fire Dept.
    Altoona, WI

    IACOJ - Director of Cheese and Whine
    http://www.cheddarvision.tv/
    EAT CHEESE OR DIE!!

  5. #5
    Forum Member axemanst3's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    eastern shore of md
    Posts
    211

    Default

    The panel is still all manual! that's what suprised me


    I talked to Troy like 2 days ago!! wierd... met him in pennsylvania at the convention, very helpful to talk to

  6. #6
    MembersZone Subscriber Dickey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2000
    Location
    Wisconsin
    Posts
    5,111

    Default

    Oh, thought their panel was all electronic. Oopsey!
    The one I'm thinking of must be the deluxe model or something.

    Yeah, Troy knows his stuff. In fact, another truck manufacturer that will remain nameless (east side of WI, another name for puncture...lol) called him about a problem they had with their CAFS at one point.

    Good luck on your purchase. Seems like you are doing it right and researching it alot.
    Jason Knecht
    Assistant Chief
    Altoona Fire Dept.
    Altoona, WI

    IACOJ - Director of Cheese and Whine
    http://www.cheddarvision.tv/
    EAT CHEESE OR DIE!!

  7. #7
    MembersZone Subscriber
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    394

    Default

    I have alway's liked the top mount better than the side, especially for the visibility of being just a little higher off the ground. Also you ain't limited to seeing just one side of the truck, if the scene is happening on the opposite side. I feel it's also a little bit of a safety point, as you are not right next to the couplings if one of them decide to let go, not that you couldn't fall off the step on the top mount. I think the only thing that hurts a top mount is the constant climbing up and down if someone needs something or you are hooking to a hydrant, or drafting.

  8. #8
    Forum Member FyredUp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 1999
    Location
    Rural Wisconsin, Retired from the burbs of Milwaukee
    Posts
    9,844

    Default

    Top mount, side mount, rear mount, front mount...kind of the Chevy, Ford, Chrysler type of discussion. It boils down to personal preference and past experience really.

    Top mounts...

    Pros: Operator out of traffic, controls laid out for ease of ops, visibility of fireground.

    Cons: Climbing up and down (winter and ice), adds about 2 feet to the length of the rig or costs you compartment space, visibility of the fireground.

    Why is visibility a plus and a minus? Because while the pump operator can be an extra set of eyes for fireground safety I feel his job is to watch the pump and gauges not the roof top venting operation or the line going in the front door.

    Mid mounts...

    Pros: All things being equal it makes for a shorter vehicle length. If laid out properly it can be as easy to run as a top mount, pump operator is at the panel watching the panel and not the fire.

    Cons: Loss of visibilty to the fireground (dependent on apparatus placement), operator may be in traffic.


    Like I said it depends alot on what you are used to...buy what the troops want to make them happy.

    FyredUp

    FyredUp

  9. #9
    Forum Member kprsn1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Illinois
    Posts
    643

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by FyredUp View Post
    Cons: Climbing up and down (winter and ice), adds about 2 feet to the length of the rig or costs you compartment space, visibility of the fireground. FyredUp
    As mentioned the climbing up and down constantly is an issue but don't forget to factor in manpower during responses. We have both mid-mount and top-mount engines and the top mounts are great if you have enough manpower on scene otherwise you're doing a lot of additional climbing like FyredUp said. With limited initial manpower sometimes our operator is doing a lot of additional duties which makes the mid-mount more user friendly.

    Our top mount is also easier to use with the deck gun since the operator can manage the gun while monitoring the pump.

    I'd have to say I like both about equally. Of course there are times when I'm cussing because I wish I had the top for a particular fire or I wish I had the mid depending on the situation.
    SFPD Member MABAS Division 47
    Told my wife I'm at work. Told my boss I'm sick. I'm really at the fire station.
    I.A.C.O.J.

  10. #10
    Forum Member DeputyChiefGonzo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2000
    Location
    Somewhere between genius and insanity!
    Posts
    13,575

    Default

    One of the pumpers at the Massachusetts Fire Academy is a top mount. Students are intimidated by it until you tell them that is is just like a side mounted pump panel... only horizontal instead of vertical.

    I don't have a problem with the "up and down".. as long as there is sufficent room for the MPO/driver/Chauffeur to be able to get up there without having to be a contortionist!
    ‎"The education of a firefighter and the continued education of a firefighter is what makes "real" firefighters. Continuous skill development is the core of progressive firefighting. We learn by doing and doing it again and again, both on the training ground and the fireground."
    Lt. Ray McCormack, FDNY

  11. #11
    Forum Member MemphisE34a's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Memphis, TN - USA
    Posts
    2,493

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by FyredUp View Post
    Top mount, side mount, rear mount, front mount...kind of the Chevy, Ford, Chrysler type of discussion. It boils down to personal preference and past experience really.

    Top mounts...

    Pros: Operator out of traffic, controls laid out for ease of ops, visibility of fireground.

    Cons: Climbing up and down (winter and ice), adds about 2 feet to the length of the rig or costs you compartment space, visibility of the fireground.

    Why is visibility a plus and a minus? Because while the pump operator can be an extra set of eyes for fireground safety I feel his job is to watch the pump and gauges not the roof top venting operation or the line going in the front door.

    Mid mounts...

    Pros: All things being equal it makes for a shorter vehicle length. If laid out properly it can be as easy to run as a top mount, pump operator is at the panel watching the panel and not the fire.

    Cons: Loss of visibilty to the fireground (dependent on apparatus placement), operator may be in traffic.


    Like I said it depends alot on what you are used to...buy what the troops want to make them happy.

    FyredUp

    FyredUp
    FyredUp,

    I agree with all of your post, but wanted to emphasize the areas is bold.

    #1. As far as traffic goes, simple training on apparatus positioning can protect the driver on side mount pumps.

    #2. Adding length is correct, but more importantly it adds length to the wheelbase making driving the apparatus more difficult to drive than similarly configured side mount pumps.
    RK
    cell #901-494-9437

    Management is making sure things are done right. Leadership is doing the right thing. The fire service needs alot more leaders and a lot less managers.

    "Everyone goes home" is the mantra for the pussification of the modern, American fire service.


    Comments made are my own. They do not represent the official position or opinion of the Fire Department or the City for which I am employed. In fact, they are normally exactly the opposite.

  12. #12
    MembersZone Subscriber ffmedcbk1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    781

    Default

    This is a major issue on our next purchase.

    I am a side mount fan. Mainly for this reason, "the first five minutes". Getting the pump in gear, you move to the tank valve, next place the chock, to the rear break the 5", then to the panel b/c the line is likely stretched and ready, check the tray to make sure the hose is played out, then I call the hydrant to be charged (I will then check for kinks by walking around or looking behind me). Then as I have the supply, I check the intake with a little leg pressure and a guage check every so often.

    I am not a fan of top catwalk style pumps b/c I need to be fluid and quick without being up and down for these ops (on the inital ops, then I get planted at the pump and try my best to be the wiz of water)

  13. #13
    Forum Member Weruj1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 1999
    Location
    NW Ohio
    Posts
    7,857

    Default

    We have 2 top mount units and I too am debating as we are due to replace one with a Rescue Engine. We used to have 2 much shorter ALF open cabs where a side mount pump wasnt a big deal as you could almost see over the truck. I am wondering without making the thing a real "beast" if we can do a top mount rescue engine, or do we go back to side mount ?
    IACOJ both divisions and PROUD OF IT !
    Pardon me sir.. .....but I believe we are all over here !
    ATTENTION ALL SHOPPERS: Will the dead horse please report to the forums.(thanks Motown)
    RAY WAS HERE 08/28/05
    LETHA' FOREVA' ! 010607
    I'm sorry, I haven't been paying much attention for the last 3 hours.....what were we discussing?
    "but I guarentee you I will FF your arse off" from>
    http://www.firehouse.com/forums/show...60#post1137060post 115

  14. #14
    Forum Member Dave1983's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Gator Country
    Posts
    4,157

    Default Bingo!

    Quote Originally Posted by MemphisE34a View Post
    #2. Adding length is correct, but more importantly it adds length to the wheelbase making driving the apparatus more difficult to drive than similarly configured side mount pumps.

    Thats one of two things I dont like about top mounts. The other is when I used to pump, I like to be able to lean against the supply line so I can feel pressure changes. I know, you have gauges for that and its not a very safe practice if a line blows, but Im old school, I like to feel the line.

    I think it boils down to two things. One is wheelbase and how it relates to your area. Second is how often you fight fire? The main advantage I see with a top mount is visibility, so if you fight a lot of fire a top mount is a good thing. If your like us where the runs are about 25% fire and 75% everything else, the shorter wheelbase of a side mount is more important.
    Fire Marshal/Safety Officer

    IAAI-NFPA-IAFC/VCOS-Retired IAFF

    "No his mind is not for rent, to any god or government"
    RUSH-Tom Sawyer

    Success is when skill meets opportunity
    Failure is when fantasy meets reality

  15. #15
    Forum Member axemanst3's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    eastern shore of md
    Posts
    211

    Talking

    Quote Originally Posted by Weruj1 View Post
    We have 2 top mount units and I too am debating as we are due to replace one with a Rescue Engine. We used to have 2 much shorter ALF open cabs where a side mount pump wasnt a big deal as you could almost see over the truck. I am wondering without making the thing a real "beast" if we can do a top mount rescue engine, or do we go back to side mount ?


    thats exactly where we are in this whole process. I think we are going to end up with a top mount.... it wouldn't hurt my feelings if it wasn't another pierce, (thats for my brother dickey) we are considering darley and thanks to my buddy don(FyredUp) KME as well

  16. #16
    MembersZone Subscriber ffmedcbk1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    781

    Default

    I am an advocate of old school, especially when old school works.

    At FDIC, the pump ops class I went to set something in my brain that I carry to this day. He said when you show up, the ECC should look and gawg for 2 seconds, then shut up get on the pump and don't be a spectator... pump the rig!

    Plus I use that "feeling" the intake too. If we are all worried about a line bursting on you, then ask "why is the company so close to the one they are carrying in?" Shouldn't they be worried about that? As far as the 5" supply goes, all our stuff has locks on the couplings, I am not too concerned.

    my 2 cents.

  17. #17
    MembersZone Subscriber Dickey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2000
    Location
    Wisconsin
    Posts
    5,111

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LtJohns355 View Post
    t... it wouldn't hurt my feelings if it wasn't another pierce, (thats for my brother dickey)
    Thanks pal, was hoping you would catch that!

    Another thing I just thought of is that in top mounts, depending on how it is designed, can be much easier for pump maintenance and access.

    Also, what can be a disadvantage is where your crosslays are going to be. Sometimes they put them directly under the pump panel. This becomes a total bitch to lay your hose back in unless you have a pull out tray or something.
    Jason Knecht
    Assistant Chief
    Altoona Fire Dept.
    Altoona, WI

    IACOJ - Director of Cheese and Whine
    http://www.cheddarvision.tv/
    EAT CHEESE OR DIE!!

  18. #18
    Forum Member FyredUp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 1999
    Location
    Rural Wisconsin, Retired from the burbs of Milwaukee
    Posts
    9,844

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LtJohns355 View Post
    thats exactly where we are in this whole process. I think we are going to end up with a top mount.... it wouldn't hurt my feelings if it wasn't another pierce, (thats for my brother dickey) we are considering darley and thanks to my buddy don(FyredUp) KME as well
    Hey LT!

    That's HME Ahrens Fox that I sent you pictures of...

    FyredUp

  19. #19
    Forum Member axemanst3's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    eastern shore of md
    Posts
    211

    Default

    hahahaha I thought that would get your attention Don! lol KME is ok i guess don't really know anyone that has one around here.


    hey, the pics that you sent me.... how do you like the crosslays in the bumper... looks awesome and like they would be really easy to use

  20. #20
    Forum Member FyredUp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 1999
    Location
    Rural Wisconsin, Retired from the burbs of Milwaukee
    Posts
    9,844

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LtJohns355 View Post
    hahahaha I thought that would get your attention Don! lol KME is ok i guess don't really know anyone that has one around here.


    hey, the pics that you sent me.... how do you like the crosslays in the bumper... looks awesome and like they would be really easy to use
    It works out very well. They hold 200 feet of 2 inch hose each. Nice and low for ease of deployment and even better fast reloading with out climbing up on top of the rig.

    Don

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. World Of Fire Report: 09-22-05
    By PaulBrown in forum World of Fire Daily Report
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 09-27-2005, 07:37 AM
  2. World Of Fire Report: 03-20-05
    By PaulBrown in forum World of Fire Daily Report
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 03-22-2005, 10:43 PM
  3. World Of Fire Report: 03-16-05
    By PaulBrown in forum World of Fire Daily Report
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 03-18-2005, 11:15 PM
  4. World Of Fire Report: 08-10-04
    By PaulBrown in forum World of Fire Daily Report
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 08-12-2004, 08:21 AM
  5. pump panels: top vs side mount
    By esvfdfirefighter in forum Firefighters Forum
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 01-31-2001, 07:04 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts