We are purchasing new helmets and are considering the 880 chicago among others, but would like to here from anyone out there using them. Have talked to departments and tried on the others ben II, 1044, paul conway, but no one around North Dakota is using the newer 880 that I know of. Thanks for any serious input. (yea, I know helmets have been discussed on this forum before but didnt find any real helpful info on the 880 chicago) and yes I'll read and laugh with the comedians replies also.
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 20 of 41
Thread: Cairns 880 Chicago Helmet
-
10-17-2007, 01:30 AM #1MembersZone Subscriber
- Join Date
- Jan 2005
- Location
- Harvey, ND
- Posts
- 34
Cairns 880 Chicago Helmet
-
10-17-2007, 07:59 AM #2Forum Member
- Join Date
- Nov 2006
- Location
- Cupcake NY
- Posts
- 1,327
Cant go wrong with the 880. Its small and light weight. Ben II sucks, i use it to hold tobacco spit.
-
10-17-2007, 10:00 AM #3Forum Member
- Join Date
- Jan 2003
- Location
- Chicago
- Posts
- 2,503
I am a complacent liability to the fire service
-
10-17-2007, 11:06 AM #4
-
10-17-2007, 11:06 AM #5MembersZone Subscriber
- Join Date
- Jan 2005
- Location
- Harvey, ND
- Posts
- 34
Thanks for the input, I'm leaning toward the 880.... I'm sure I'll get some resistance from the modern style lovers but you cant please everyone. thanks again Jack Lt. HFD (yea, I'd like the leather but the city doesn't think my heads worth $500) Thanks again
-
10-17-2007, 11:14 AM #6
Have your dept. pay however much the 880 cost and you pick up the difference so you can get a helmet you really want.
-
10-17-2007, 06:11 PM #7
-
10-17-2007, 06:33 PM #8
I had an 880 before I switched to leather, but the 880 was awesome. It was super light and there isn't a traditional style helmet made that is lower in profile. The helmet also has great balance, even with a boat load of crap up top. I don't know why/how the 1010 became so much more popular but the 880 still gets my vote.
-
10-17-2007, 06:35 PM #9Forum Member
- Join Date
- Jan 2007
- Posts
- 15
Whats wrong with the ben II ? I was thinking of picking one up.
-
10-17-2007, 07:16 PM #10MembersZone Subscriber
- Join Date
- Sep 2003
- Location
- the corner of walk and don't walk
- Posts
- 396
Ben 2 is garbage,,,although not as bad as a 1010,,,1010 is worse than garbage, I can't get either one to fit me like my leather.
Chris Polimeni
Prince George's County FD
Back at the Big 29er
-
10-17-2007, 09:16 PM #11Forum Member
- Join Date
- Jan 2007
- Posts
- 15
so the only thing that makes them crap is that they dont fit well?
-
10-17-2007, 09:24 PM #12Forum Member
- Join Date
- Jan 2003
- Location
- Chicago
- Posts
- 2,503
-
10-17-2007, 10:41 PM #13
-
10-18-2007, 09:16 AM #14MembersZone Subscriber
- Join Date
- Sep 2003
- Location
- the corner of walk and don't walk
- Posts
- 396
I have dropped a "helmet made with new technology" on the bay floor (fell of my gear rack while getting my stuff together). It cracked the shell. I have also dropped my leather doing the same thing. No problems. Couple that with the fact that they sit too high on my head, don't fit well, are not comfortable makes them garbage.
Ever see the fire helmet testing exhibit at Epcot center? The test repeatedly drops a huge barrel on top of the helmet. The helmet doesn't break, but I would bet dimes to donuts that the spine of the FF wearing that helmet would. Sometimes old technology really is better. Maybe ChicagoFF can speak up about the old Senators (I think thats what they were called) that were issued in the Windy City. I may be wrong, but I think those were the original "plastic traditional helmets", I think they stopped making them in the early nineties.
Stay SafeChris Polimeni
Prince George's County FD
Back at the Big 29er
-
10-18-2007, 10:51 AM #15
I have tried the Cairns 880, the Phenix TL-2, and now I am on the classic Cairns N5A. I have to tell you that the 880 is horrible. Stick with the leather. A real leather, not the Phenix. N5A or N6A. The other two make you feel like the helmet sits on top of your head and if you lean left or right, you will tip over.
-
10-19-2007, 09:38 AM #16MembersZone Subscriber
- Join Date
- Sep 2003
- Location
- the corner of walk and don't walk
- Posts
- 396
I have a question if anyone knows........What is the difference between the 880 "Tradition" and the 880 "Chicago"?
Stay SafeChris Polimeni
Prince George's County FD
Back at the Big 29er
-
10-19-2007, 10:04 AM #17MembersZone Subscriber
- Join Date
- Dec 2000
- Posts
- 933
From the MSA/Cairns website
New shell texture for fire-hardened appearanceSo the helmet probably does not have a glossy appearance and looks like it has seen some action.....I guess.......Other than that, probably the same..The MSA 880 Tradition Chicago Style
Fire Helmet from Cairns Helmets
combines traditional design and
legendary performance with modern
materials and a new fire-hardened look.
This helmet’s design offers a low-ride
and compact profile for superior
clearance and maneuverability. The
tough, high-temperature thermoplastic
shell resists chipping and cracking.
Cairns Helmets’ standard five-year shell
replacement warranty provides
insurance against fire ground damage.
Our high-tech thermal impact cap
provides increased heat and impact
protection. Unique tube-lock system
helps to absorb the shock of an impact.
Ultra-high temperature TPR edge trim
prevents against melting or dripping.
The three-position, rear-ratchet
height adjustment ensures a secure
and comfortable fit for all head sizes
between 5 5/8” and 7 5/8” inches. Front
headband adjustment features an
exclusive SCBA interface that matches
the fit of any SCBA facepiece. Contact
MSA Customer Service for available
colors.
On a side note, they do not adjust out as big as the 1010 or 1000 (6-3/8 and 8-3/8 inches) vs. 880 ( 5 5/8” and 7 5/8” ) ....so if you have a "physically" big head it may not fitLast edited by ehs7554; 10-19-2007 at 10:07 AM.
-
10-19-2007, 10:09 AM #18MembersZone Subscriber
- Join Date
- Sep 2003
- Location
- the corner of walk and don't walk
- Posts
- 396
Thanks
Stay SafeChris Polimeni
Prince George's County FD
Back at the Big 29er
-
10-19-2007, 11:20 AM #19
If I couldn't wear my 5A, I would be wearing an 880.
"Train as if your life depends on it"
Always Remember *343*
-
10-19-2007, 11:53 PM #20
880
We bought the "new 880" when they were re-issued 2-3 years ago. I love it, small profile, light weight, good balance....etc. Guys with huge melons might have trouble with it, but I'd say 90% of our guys like em. We had 1010's prior and I thought they were pieces of junk, heavy, un-balanced, fell apart. The 880 is the best plastic traditional out there IMO......
My opinion only.Last edited by FHandz15; 10-19-2007 at 11:56 PM.
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Similar Threads
-
Msa Cairns 1044 Defender Helmet
By ems18909 in forum Firefighters ForumReplies: 6Last Post: 07-16-2007, 12:05 AM -
World Of Fire Report: 02-12-06
By PaulBrown in forum World of Fire Daily ReportReplies: 0Last Post: 02-15-2006, 10:51 PM -
Cairns 880 Helmets (Problems)
By Baffa1 in forum Firefighters ForumReplies: 1Last Post: 11-07-2004, 07:07 PM -
New Cairns 880 Tradition Helmet
By LFDAC21 in forum Firefighters ForumReplies: 12Last Post: 12-04-2003, 02:50 PM -
Chicago Helmet fronts
By matt818 in forum Firefighters ForumReplies: 5Last Post: 04-13-2001, 04:56 PM

LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks





