Why register? ...To Enhance Your Experience
+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 79

Thread: safety Vests

  1. #1
    MembersZone Subscriber
    Join Date
    Dec 2000
    Posts
    933

    Default safety Vests

    How many of you are required to wear safety vests over their turnouts when on MVA's and other similar non fire calls????

    Don't our turn out coats have enough reflectivity??
    Who's Idea was this???


  2. #2
    Forum Member nmfire's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Maryland (DC Suburb)
    Posts
    5,738

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ehs7554 View Post
    How many of you are required to wear safety vests over their turnouts when on MVA's and other similar non fire calls????
    Only the individual directing traffic on each end of the incident. And even then, it isn't a requirement for us but we do have vests.

    Quote Originally Posted by ehs7554 View Post
    Don't our turn out coats have enough reflectivity??
    No, actually they don't. Not if you intend to meet the applicable ANSI standards for class II reflective vests.

    Quote Originally Posted by ehs7554 View Post
    Who's Idea was this???
    Who's idea was what? Its up to your department. So I doubt anyone on this forum will know which officer of your department made these mandatory for you to wear.
    Even the burger-flippers at McDonald's probably have some McWackers.

  3. #3
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Plymouth Meeting, PA
    Posts
    298

    Default

    Two of the three fire companies that I belong to cover sections of the PA turnpike. The turnpike commission does not like to shut down the lanes unless it is definintely necessary.

    For our protection and as part of an agreement with the turnpike, we are required to wear vests over our gear when operating.

    Usually, in my local area, I do not wear additional vests since the local PD have no problem closing down sections of the effected roadways for periods of time.

  4. #4
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    2,503

    Default

    No vests........
    I am a complacent liability to the fire service

  5. #5
    Back In Black ChiefKN's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    The Nice Part of New Jersey
    Posts
    6,981

    Default

    ANSI Class III vests when not wearing turnout coat for any roadway incident.
    I am now a past chief and the views, opinions, and comments are mine and mine alone. I do not speak for any department or in any official capacity. Although, they would be smart to listen to me.

    "The last thing I want to do is hurt you. But it's still on the list."

    "When tempted to fight fire with fire, remember that the Fire Department usually uses water."

  6. #6
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    N. Ridgeville, Ohio
    Posts
    811

    Default

    Actually it is from the federal MUTCD code. Anytime the road is closed temporarily we fall under the code for construction zones. It specifies the amount of reflective material that must be worn.
    http://mutcd.fhwa.dot.gov/
    Jason Brooks
    IAFF Local 2388
    IACOJ

  7. #7
    Forum Member nmfire's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Maryland (DC Suburb)
    Posts
    5,738

    Default

    In addition to the MUTCD, the state can provide its own supplement that overrides portions of the MUTCD. These overrides can be more or less restrictive.
    Even the burger-flippers at McDonald's probably have some McWackers.

  8. #8
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Cupcake NY
    Posts
    1,327

    Default

    Its a good idea to wear them. People dont see us, they see the two wrecked cars. Ill wear xmas lights like in Spy's like us if it means no one will get hurt.

  9. #9
    Let's talk fire trucks! BoxAlarm187's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Virginia
    Posts
    3,280

    Default

    Yes, we wear vests over our turnouts. As was referenced earlier, the turnouts do not meet the MUTCD standards for ANSI Class II and Class III vests for reflectivity and color.

    When I was assigned to my new station as a LT, I informed the FF's that one thing that I would not compromise on was not wearing traffic vests while working on the roadways. As you might expect, there was grumbling until they started seeing how much more visible we were as compared to the other personnel operating (both day and night). Now they don't even have to be reminded to don thier vests.

    From the ResponderSafety.com website is this related article: http://www.respondersafety.com/fullstory.php?55176
    Career Fire Captain
    Volunteer Chief Officer


    Never taking for granted that I'm privileged enough to have the greatest job in the world!

  10. #10
    MembersZone Subscriber PAZ711's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    NE PA
    Posts
    49

    Default

    We don't even have vests to wear, let alone SOP's directing their use. Our Fire Police do wear their vests & gloves when on scene directing traffic.

  11. #11
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    1,063

    Default

    We wear them whenever we are operating in the street. MVA's that sort of thing.

  12. #12
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    64

    Default

    Don't forget NFPA 1500 A.8.7 and A.8.7.10

    Also note that for the past 30 years an average of 4.5 or so Firefighters have be struck and killed by vehicles while on duty.

    There is alot more to traffic safety than just wearing vests...

    Our SOG states that we will properly place our vehicles / apparatus to protect our members in a "BLOCKING" position. This along with vests or full turnout gear with proper reflective stripes and the use of cones to pre-warn motorists.

    Have fun out there, do your job and be safe. Your family needs you.
    Last edited by FIRECAPT62; 02-18-2008 at 11:43 AM.

  13. #13
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Memphis Tn,USA-now
    Posts
    5,436

    Default

    Traffic details wear vests and flashlights with wands to draw attention to themselves.It'd be nice if drivers would actually DRIVE instead of have one hand on the wheel and the other holding the cell phone to their head calling to let their people know why they're going to be late.
    Ahh,memories of people wanting to know if they can drive down their street because their house is"right there and I'll only have to cross the first hose...."

  14. #14
    Forum Member gunnyv's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Location
    SE MI
    Posts
    1,425

    Default

    We have been told there is a new federal law going into effect next year requiring vests. The county chiefs association came up with a program to meet the requirements. We were fitted yesterday, and from the BC on down there were comments about how ridiculous they are and "I'm not wearing that thing."

    I'll wear mine, and will take advantage of any safety equipment I can get my hands on.

  15. #15
    Forum Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Champaign,IL
    Posts
    8

    Default

    At my dept. it is up to the highest ranking officer o/s.
    Captian Pitcher

  16. #16
    MembersZone Subscriber SteveDude's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    London, England
    Posts
    1,254

    Default

    We have to wear high visibility vests over a percentage of the torso including the agreed amount of reflective tape as per British & EU Standards.

    But that applies to everyone who works in or around moving vehciles from Police to Lorry Drivers. Some may be able to just wear a hi viz vest, others such as Traffic cops who are constantly exposed ot fast moving traffic will have to wear a full length coat.

    Some LFB Guys at a dielsel spill wearing our standard Hi Viz vest.


    A Met Police Traffic Cop wearing full length Hi Viz jacket
    Steve Dude
    IACOJ member
    www.fireservice.co.uk

    London Fire Brigade...."Can Do"


    'Irony'... It's a British thing.

  17. #17
    Forum Member MemphisE34a's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Memphis, TN - USA
    Posts
    2,522

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by gunnyv View Post
    We have been told there is a new federal law going into effect next year requiring vests."
    The Federal law actually went into effect this year on Jan 1., there is a grace period however for departments to get into compliance.

    Most turnouts DO meet the reflectivity standards but they do not meet the conspicuity requirements - the yellow or orange color.

    I guess your state or department can choose to follow the new law or not, but it would appear that liability will go soemthing like this:

    Your department does not purchase vests. A member gets hurt or killed. He or his family wins in court - hopefully.

    Your department does purchase vests and you decide not to wear it, you lose.
    RK
    cell #901-494-9437

    Management is making sure things are done right. Leadership is doing the right thing. The fire service needs alot more leaders and a lot less managers.

    "Everyone goes home" is the mantra for the pussification of the modern, American fire service.


    Comments made are my own. They do not represent the official position or opinion of the Fire Department or the City for which I am employed. In fact, they are normally exactly the opposite.

  18. #18
    Forum Member backsteprescue123's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    4,318

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MemphisE34a View Post
    The Federal law actually went into effect this year on Jan 1., there is a grace period however for departments to get into compliance.

    Most turnouts DO meet the reflectivity standards but they do not meet the conspicuity requirements - the yellow or orange color.

    I guess your state or department can choose to follow the new law or not, but it would appear that liability will go soemthing like this:

    Your department does not purchase vests. A member gets hurt or killed. He or his family wins in court - hopefully.

    Your department does purchase vests and you decide not to wear it, you lose.
    I thought that it went into effect Jan 1st as well.



    I know that I posted these in another thread, but here are ours, which we must wear at any MVA or incident on a roadway (interstate, city streets, anything)



    ------------------------------------
    These opinions are mine and do not reflect the opinions of any organizations I am affiliated with.
    ------------------------------------

  19. #19
    Forum Member nmfire's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Maryland (DC Suburb)
    Posts
    5,738

    Default

    Can someone give me some information or a link on this law?
    Even the burger-flippers at McDonald's probably have some McWackers.

  20. #20
    Let's talk fire trucks! BoxAlarm187's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Virginia
    Posts
    3,280

    Default

    I got an e-mail about the new law a few weeks ago, and I'll be damned if I can find it now. I looked for it before I even posted my original post in this thread. I seem to remember that you have until October 2008 to comply?
    Career Fire Captain
    Volunteer Chief Officer


    Never taking for granted that I'm privileged enough to have the greatest job in the world!

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. weight vests
    By edreiman in forum Health and Wellness
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 03-13-2003, 01:33 AM
  2. Canadian supplier for IC and Safety vests
    By Gallonspermin in forum Firefighters Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 04-08-2002, 07:24 PM
  3. Bulletproof Vests
    By firespy in forum Firefighters Forum
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 10-01-2001, 06:47 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts