[an error occurred while processing this directive]
Be There
sp
Check E-Mail | Forums Login | Shop Now | Advertise    PowerSearch:    
Firehouse Magazine
store
Home | News | Forums | Links | Magazine | InfoZone | Win | Images | Events | SuperStore | Classifieds
Off-Site Headlines | Live Dispatch | InterActive | World of Fire | EMS | Line of Duty | Extrication | Chat
E-Mail Minder
Inside the Worcester Tragedy
Main Coverage

Worcester Widows Sue Building Owner

$6 Million Allocated To Worcester Families

White House Urges Solution on T&G Fund

Worcester Kin May Not Get Funds

New Board to Oversee Worcester Firefighters Fund Payout

Grants Likely For Families

Attorneys Argue For Homeless Couple

Last Firefighter Laid to Rest

Final Salute Friday

Fund Tops $2.6m

Federal Probe To Take Months

Land Offered as Memorial

Tough Call

Pair Escape

Last Hug

Healing Begins

Aftermath

Last Hero Heads Home

Memorial Service Video

Tribute Slide Show

Engine 7

Clinton's Remarks

Carter: We Honor Their Memory

Whitehead's Remarks

Sifting Through the Ashes

Firefighters Remembered

Thousands Attend Memorial

"Gone But Not Forgotten"

"A Fireman's Prayer"

Tribute at Fire Scene

Special Train Honors Firefighters

Kid's Tribute to Fallen Heroes

Victim Profiles
  • Jackson
  • Brotherton
  • Spencer
  • McGuirk
  • Lyons
  • Lucey

Body of Second FF Found

Homeless Couple Charged

Search Frustrating

Firefighter Found

Memorial Service

"Mayday, Mayday"

Support Pours In

Post/View Condolences

Video News Reports

Image Slide Show

Related Links

Federal Aid Approved

No Greater Tragedy in 27 Years

Internet Messages Salute FF's

Family Funds

Firefighters Adapt to New Roles

Major Multi-FF Fatal Fires Since '60

Worst U.S. FF Tragedies

U.S. Fire Death Picture

Worcester, MA FD

Initial Story

Posted: Friday, January 7, 1999 - 3 PM

Attorneys Argue For Homeless Couple

The Associated Press

WORCESTER, Mass. (AP) -- A homeless couple accused of accidentally starting a warehouse blaze that led to the deaths of six firefighters were not obligated to report the fire, their attorneys said Thursday in arguing for their release from jail.

At a bail hearing, lawyers for Thomas Levesque, 37, and Julie Barnes, 19, also argued that prosecutors had not shown the firefighters' deaths could have been prevented if Barnes and Levesque reported the fire.

Fire

Surrounded by court officers, Julie S. Barnes, 19, and Thomas S. Levesque, 37, are arraigned in Worcester Central Court in early December

Copyright 1999, Worcester Telegram & Gazette
Republished with permission

``There is no affirmative duty that required her to report the fire,'' said Barnes' attorney, Michael Wilcox.

Barnes and Levesque have pleaded innocent to six counts of involuntary manslaughter in connection with the Dec. 3 warehouse fire at the Worcester Cold Storage and Warehouse Co. where they had been living. Firefighters had been told the couple lived in the building and entered the building, in part, to find them.

On Thursday, prosecutors portrayed Levesque as a man who felt no regret about the fire.

Assistant District Attorney Lawrence Murphy said that after kicking over a candle during an argument with Barnes, Levesque told Barnes, ``I don't give a (expletive),'' before heading to an arcade with her to listen to music.

Levesque's attorney argued that the comment was made in reference to clothes burned in the fire and said Levesque was deeply saddened by the firefighters' deaths.

``He is overwhelmed by remorse,'' said Ryan. ``Mr. Levesque is like a child. ... He is scared to death.''

Judge Elliot Zide rejected motions to release the defendants on personal recognizance, despite lawyers' arguments that Barnes is four months pregnant and that Levesque is mildly retarded.

Zide reduced Levesque's bail to $250,000 and Barnes' to $75,000; both had been held on $1 million bail. They did not post the new bond amounts Thursday.

Zide also deemed Levesque mentally competent to stand trial and set a conference date for Feb. 21.



[an error occurred while processing this directive]
[an error occurred while processing this directive]